d1sc prochargers
thanks joe
Last edited by jegan1989; Dec 8, 2006 at 04:18 PM.
thanks joe
thanks joe
However, I think that the D1-SCs might actually benefit from it if you were to start exceeding the potential output of a single D1-SC. Although, at that point I would be inclined to just get an F1.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Predator Performance put 2 D1SC's on a CTS-V about a year and a half ago. I heard it made something like 900 hp on low boost, but since it's just a show car they de-tuned it a bit. That's all I know.
thanks joe
thanks joe
On other applications it's sensible, such as the factory produced Aston Martin twin supercharged Vanatage, released in 1993. It ran twin Eaton M90's.
A similar setup was used on the the Lister Jagaur XJS V12.
There are two reasons for doing this, well maybe three.
1. With a large/larger displacement motor you need a big blower. Proof of this is even a LS1 346ci will max out a newer Eaton M112R.
Back in the day the M90 was the best Eaton offered and on a 5.3 DOHC V8 llike the Aston, or the 6.2 litre Lister Jagaur V12 a single blower of that size simply was sufficent to supply enough air flow, even maxing out the blower.
So by running two blowers they could run each one more efficently and still make more NET power/gain.
2. Both of these engines where OHC and they had a seperate inlet manifold per bank, not a large single inlet manfiold like a LS1. This means in respect you could say each blower was only feeding 4 cylinders and half the displacement. This again tally's back to running the blowers at a more efficent state. With a single intake manifold I think you'd loose some of this benifit.
3. Packaging and location. Espcially with the Jaguar V12 there is only limited space, none above the engine. So running two blowers either side of the eninge made routing each blower very simple. The TB's where on the sides of the engine. Running a single large blower as per todays centrifugal ones would have been more difficult to locate in these vehicles. Not so in the Fbody though.
A well sized single blower for the displacement/HP on a LS1 is IMO the better and of course cheaper and less complex solution.


Last edited by 300bhp/ton; Dec 8, 2006 at 10:37 AM.
i will get someone to Sponsor this
thanks joe
Maybe you should look at a roots blower with a procharger feeding into it...It would have great low end response and an awesome top end... With the twin Prochargers you are going to have to do a custom mounting bracket for the passenger side which is surely going to mess with the ac and the whole point behind a procharger on a camaro is simplicity and to be easier for the installer... I can see doing a twin procharger if you want to be the first but I don't know if the gains are going to be as rewarding as you are hoping... Either way goodluck and post pics!!!
but is there anyway i can set up two intakes one for each procharger
i would like it if someone would sponsor this project because i think dont get me wrong a turbo set up is more of a import thing and that people would rather have a twin procharger set up
if anyone knows someone that might be interested in sponsoring something like this let me know
thanks joe
In the late 80's early 90's during ProStreet you'd find people building outrageous combinations just for attention. Rick Dobbertin's J2000 - turbo, blower, nitrous, Rocky Robertson's Kaiser BBC crate engine with 2 Paxton SN93's. Saw a yellow '69 camaro at GoodGuys last year with a bbc and 2 Powerdyne's. These are just for show. There is no performance advantage to have two supercharger drive mechanisms and requisite losses when a single is available with appropriate airflow. W2W's nova had two Rotrex superchargers because its necessary for their desired airflow.
As pnyhntr mentioned with an fbody, most of the system would be hidden, if even possible due to space contraints.
If you wanna go fast there are easier and more effective ways to do it. If you just want the looks, then don't expect someone else to be willing to foot your bill for something of questionable taste and performance.
http://www.dobbertinhydrocar.com/J2000%20Engine.htm
http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicl.../photo_03.html
Last edited by andereck; Dec 8, 2006 at 03:44 PM.
In the late 80's early 90's during ProStreet you'd find people building outrageous combinations just for attention. Rick Dobbertin's J2000 - turbo, blower, nitrous, Rocky Robertson's Kaiser BBC crate engine with 2 Paxton SN93's. Saw a yellow '69 camaro at GoodGuys last year with a bbc and 2 Powerdyne's. These are just for show. There is no performance advantage to have two supercharger drive mechanisms and requisite losses when a single is available with appropriate airflow. W2W's nova had two Rotrex superchargers because its necessary for their desired airflow.
As pnyhntr mentioned with an fbody, most of the system would be hidden, if even possible due to space contraints.
If you wanna go fast there are easier and more effective ways to do it. If you just want the looks, then don't expect someone else to be willing to foot your bill for something of questionable taste and performance.
http://www.dobbertinhydrocar.com/J2000%20Engine.htm
http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicl.../photo_03.html
I agree-this isn't like having 2 girls in bed
thanks joe


BOSS APPROVED!




