








AEM TRU Boost or E-Boost2?
Apexi = JUNK They may have fixed their QC problem by now but I went through two of them and personally know 2 others that failed and almost cost a couple of engines.
EB2 I use one and set another one up. Easy to program IMHO. Has some nice safety features if used properly that could save an engine if a gate fails. Overboost protection. Overboost warning buzzer, etc.
Best thing about EB2 is that it is very stable in boost control and that is mucho important. Another good thing about EB2 is a lot of people have used it with good results. I've learned the hard way to not R & D new products.
All the others may be great (other than Apexi = junk). But with FI there are a few golden rules. One is don't go cheap on boost control....another is don't go cheap on fuel supply or quality.........
Apexi = JUNK They may have fixed their QC problem by now but I went through two of them and personally know 2 others that failed and almost cost a couple of engines.
EB2 I use one and set another one up. Easy to program IMHO. Has some nice safety features if used properly that could save an engine if a gate fails. Overboost protection. Overboost warning buzzer, etc.
Best thing about EB2 is that it is very stable in boost control and that is mucho important. Another good thing about EB2 is a lot of people have used it with good results. I've learned the hard way to not R & D new products.
All the others may be great (other than Apexi = junk). But with FI there are a few golden rules. One is don't go cheap on boost control....another is don't go cheap on fuel supply or quality.........
right, the AEM has all the safety features as well, I am not really gong for the cheapest controller, I just don't need all the other features that the EB2 has so I don't see the point in buying it when the AEM one has just what I need.





