Ohio Boys and Tom Kempf
06-27-2008, 11:34 AM
#22
Goldrust,
Is that the Aeromotive 11105 (17140) kit? If so we maxxed one of those out on our Supra, we were running methanol with a single GT4788 and were out of pump at ~1070 whp through a TH400. Aeromotive rates that pump to 3600 on gasoline, so you should be fine, but I would still keep an eye on fuel pressure because with those turbos you should be making some sick power.
Is that the Aeromotive 11105 (17140) kit? If so we maxxed one of those out on our Supra, we were running methanol with a single GT4788 and were out of pump at ~1070 whp through a TH400. Aeromotive rates that pump to 3600 on gasoline, so you should be fine, but I would still keep an eye on fuel pressure because with those turbos you should be making some sick power.
06-27-2008, 01:34 PM
#26
LS1TECH Sponsor / 7 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where have you been? We did get it down track. Ran better to the 330 than we ever did then the fuel pressure went bye-bye. I didn't feel like redoing the entire fuel system, besides you guys aren't even close to us when we run the 106.
06-27-2008, 02:15 PM
#27
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can you guys post of your best time agian? That way we know what times to shoot for when we go out testing on the radial. Put the 114 back on that car you guys have running. I think we'll be able to run faster and quicker then you guys on drag radials real soon. 
Time will tell
Good luck with the 88 build. Those turbo's are pretty big... packaging becomes a bitch! specially when you have to rock two 4" or 5" DP's behind the K-member. Post some pictures of the chassis when you get it back too. The one's madman sent me look pretty cool, should be a fast car!
Stenod
Time will tell Good luck with the 88 build. Those turbo's are pretty big... packaging becomes a bitch! specially when you have to rock two 4" or 5" DP's behind the K-member. Post some pictures of the chassis when you get it back too. The one's madman sent me look pretty cool, should be a fast car!
Stenod
06-27-2008, 02:39 PM
#28
LS1TECH Sponsor / 7 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best 1/8 mile time was 4.93, the best 1/4 mile 7.57, and best mph was 193.86. Good luck on getting there. I hope some one beats it before we get this new project up and running because it is no fun breaking our own record. 
06-27-2008, 03:20 PM
#30
LS1TECH Sponsor / 7 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm glad you got rid of the 101, it's about time. And even pushing the gaskets we still went faster than you. Like I have always said before, stop posting and go test with your new not 101 turbo. Then when you beat our record or hell just come close then come back and post. Hell my buddy Steve and the Ohio boys are still faster than you guys with their. ls2 block.
06-27-2008, 06:10 PM
#33
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont get your panties in a whad, just trying to start some harmless **** talking.
Tom, you know im just messing around, your car will definately be a top contender for the lsx shootout this year.
Where are my boys from Ohio?
06-27-2008, 07:39 PM
#35
That pump flows 2700 lbs an hour of fuel and if you take that and divide it by .63 (the general brake specific fuel consumption for a forced induction application) that comes out to roughly 4285 hp. Now that would be in a perfect world, and I know we're not but it should be good enough to supply all 16 165 pound an hour injectors. 
