Out of pump, injector, or both.
"All MagnaFuel high volume fuel pumps also require a -8 or ½” vent in the fuel tank. The venting on stock tanks is not adequate."
If your baseline is 58 psi at idle, then the FPR should reduce fuel pressure by about 8-10 psi if your vacuum is about 8-10 psi at idle to compensate for the vacuum at the tip of the injector (FPR reduces rail pressure to the injector down to 48 psi) .
If your baseline is 58 psi at idle, then the FPR should increase rail pressure equal to boost (14 psi) to overcome the pressure of 14 psi at the external tip of the fuel injector (58 + 14 = 72 psi - so you need 72 psi at the rail/FPR gauge when at 14 lbs of boost).
The FPR will react 1:1 throughout the entire range from idle (reduce/subtract) all the way to maximum boost (increase/add) and why the IFR table should be flatlined to whatever the baseline is.
Last edited by dlandsvZ28; Apr 5, 2019 at 08:34 AM.
"All MagnaFuel high volume fuel pumps also require a -8 or ½” vent in the fuel tank. The venting on stock tanks is not adequate."
If your baseline is 58 psi at idle, then the FPR should reduce fuel pressure by about 8-10 psi if your vacuum is about 8-10 psi at idle to compensate for the vacuum at the tip of the injector (FPR reduces rail pressure to the injector down to 48 psi) .
If your baseline is 58 psi at idle, then the FPR should increase rail pressure equal to boost (14 psi) to overcome the pressure of 14 psi at the external tip of the fuel injector (58 + 14 = 72 psi - so you need 72 psi at the rail/FPR gauge when at 14 lbs of boost).
The FPR will react 1:1 throughout the entire range from idle (reduce/subtract) all the way to maximum boost (increase/add) and why the IFR table should be flatlined to whatever the baseline is.
aem wideband in the rear o2 bung on the drivers side reads good afr every where idle and drive ability are amazing. Afr in boost is 11.5 to 1 on the gas scale all the way up just maxed on duty cycle about 150 rwhp sooner than I think I should be.
Just can't see recyling 200 lph more per hour thru the tank when it's not needed (one 450).
Any chance the gauge on my fuel rail is way off? Seems unlikely with how easy it was to tune and how well it performs just maxing our idc way to soon.
Just can't see recyling 200 lph more per hour thru the tank when it's not needed (one 450).
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Im also going to try running the pump ground to a different location. I’m just going to put it back together and live at my current boost level for a while and rethink things I’m losing patience and need to step away from it.
Im also going to try running the pump ground to a different location. I’m just going to put it back together and live at my current boost level for a while and rethink things I’m losing patience and need to step away from it.
IMO, the problem is not the injectors. If they actually flowed 940cc, that's about 91lbs and using a BSFC of .76 for E70 (assuming the AFR is not fat), they should support about 700rwhp @ 85% DC.
If the injector DC is 95 0r 100%, it doesn't necessarily mean you are out of injector. If you are not getting proper fuel delivery, the fuel pressure is going to drop and the ECM will try to compensate by increasing INJ DC. As noted by others, the fuel delivery problem could be from pressure not rising with boost, incorrect micron/restriction pre-pump, low voltage at the pump, not what the ECM is reporting or the pump itself. As for the pump itself, I cringe every time I see someone quoting the Magnafuel marketing numbers. Those numbers are meaningless when it comes to forced induction and worse when using ethanol. Since Magnafuel does not publish flow charts, you need to call them and ask for the flow number at the pressure you run (base + Boost). They'll probably give to you in gal/min, so convert that to lb/hr, divide by .76 (BSFC for E70) to get FWHP. But wait, there's more. You need to convert that to RWHP and then reduce that number by approx. 10% to account for flow loss from friction in the hose, fittings, especially with bends (not all fittings are made equal), and the filter. Only then will you know what the pump will actually flow and you might be surprised. If the final number is enough to support 700rwhp, then focus on the other things mentioned, like voltage at the pump, fuel pressure, etc. You absolutely have to find a way know fuel pressure under boost for more than a quick flash and voltage at the pump.
Like I said, I've dealt with these issues and anything I say is from my experiences. I am one of those who did not have luck with the 4303, switched to dual AEM380s and haven't looked back. So, in summary, if the INJs can flow enough and the pump flow is enough (I think it should be), then you need to determine what is causing the fuel delivery problems. Don't spend anymore money until you make that determination. FYI, Wallace calculator says about 1100rwhp for me and I am using AUS 1400cc injs @ 50psi, with 2 AEM380s running E55 and 2 10gph alky nozzles. You should have enough to support what you're trying to do. You just need to do a little detective work. If the problem is the same going from a 4301 to a 4303, that's a clue.
Good luck.
IMO, the problem is not the injectors. If they actually flowed 940cc, that's about 91lbs and using a BSFC of .76 for E70 (assuming the AFR is not fat), they should support about 700rwhp @ 85% DC.
If the injector DC is 95 0r 100%, it doesn't necessarily mean you are out of injector. If you are not getting proper fuel delivery, the fuel pressure is going to drop and the ECM will try to compensate by increasing INJ DC. As noted by others, the fuel delivery problem could be from pressure not rising with boost, incorrect micron/restriction pre-pump, low voltage at the pump, not what the ECM is reporting or the pump itself. As for the pump itself, I cringe every time I see someone quoting the Magnafuel marketing numbers. Those numbers are meaningless when it comes to forced induction and worse when using ethanol. Since Magnafuel does not publish flow charts, you need to call them and ask for the flow number at the pressure you run (base + Boost). They'll probably give to you in gal/min, so convert that to lb/hr, divide by .76 (BSFC for E70) to get FWHP. But wait, there's more. You need to convert that to RWHP and then reduce that number by approx. 10% to account for flow loss from friction in the hose, fittings, especially with bends (not all fittings are made equal), and the filter. Only then will you know what the pump will actually flow and you might be surprised. If the final number is enough to support 700rwhp, then focus on the other things mentioned, like voltage at the pump, fuel pressure, etc. You absolutely have to find a way know fuel pressure under boost for more than a quick flash and voltage at the pump.
Like I said, I've dealt with these issues and anything I say is from my experiences. I am one of those who did not have luck with the 4303, switched to dual AEM380s and haven't looked back. So, in summary, if the INJs can flow enough and the pump flow is enough (I think it should be), then you need to determine what is causing the fuel delivery problems. Don't spend anymore money until you make that determination. FYI, Wallace calculator says about 1100rwhp for me and I am using AUS 1400cc injs @ 50psi, with 2 AEM380s running E55 and 2 10gph alky nozzles. You should have enough to support what you're trying to do. You just need to do a little detective work. If the problem is the same going from a 4301 to a 4303, that's a clue.
Good luck.
The filters looked good and passed the test Magnafuel recommended. I went ahead and put new filters in anyway. 74 micron pre and 25 post just as Magnafuel suggested. I also ran a new ground from the pump to the subframe since I was only grounded to the body previously.
Same 55 psi base and I was rich every where except idle. In boost I was mid 10’s afr so something definitely changed. I made some adjustments and have all my afr’s back in line. I just went out again and was 73 percent idc at 6000 rpm with an 11.2 afr on the gas scale. Things escalate quickly above 6000 with a procharger, but I definitely think it’s an improvement. Traffic didn’t allow my to get above 6000.
Im going to enjoy the car for a bit and run it in the local 1/8th before the end of the month. I’m also going to get setup to start logging fuel pressure to see what is going on and make for easier trouble shooting in the future.
I still dont think my fuel system is performing up to my expectations, but definitely an improvement.
Last edited by BCNUL8R; Apr 6, 2019 at 01:32 PM.










