Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10
Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10 rpm HP
2500 2.9
2600 2.5
2700 3.1
2800 2.1
2900 2.8
3000 1.1
3100 3.0
3200 3.0
3300 3.8
3400 2.6
3500 2.0
3600 2.1
3700 4.9
3800 2.9
3900 2.2
4000 1.5
4100 2.3
4200 2.4
4300 4.1
4400 2.5
4500 3.4
4600 5.3
4700 6.3
4800 6.4
4900 6.5
5000 6.7
5100 7.8
5200 8.9
5300 9.1
5400 11.3
5500 12.6
5600 12.8
5700 11.9
5800 12.1
5900 13.5
6000 16.0
6100 16.3
6200 17.7
On a dynojet dyno (MTI), With a ~410 hp M6 car.
Please note that the HP loss *on the dyno* is not accurately reflective of the HP loss on the track or road. This is for comparison purposes only.
\chris
2500 2.9
2600 2.5
2700 3.1
2800 2.1
2900 2.8
3000 1.1
3100 3.0
3200 3.0
3300 3.8
3400 2.6
3500 2.0
3600 2.1
3700 4.9
3800 2.9
3900 2.2
4000 1.5
4100 2.3
4200 2.4
4300 4.1
4400 2.5
4500 3.4
4600 5.3
4700 6.3
4800 6.4
4900 6.5
5000 6.7
5100 7.8
5200 8.9
5300 9.1
5400 11.3
5500 12.6
5600 12.8
5700 11.9
5800 12.1
5900 13.5
6000 16.0
6100 16.3
6200 17.7
On a dynojet dyno (MTI), With a ~410 hp M6 car.
Please note that the HP loss *on the dyno* is not accurately reflective of the HP loss on the track or road. This is for comparison purposes only.
\chris
Re: Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10 Man I should put some 3.23s back in my car to get some great dyno numbers. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Launching!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Re: Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10 EXACTLY why I am in the process of rebuilding my rear with my original 3.42 gears. The 4.10's I installed years ago before I had the 382 are just WAY too much now. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />
Re: Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10 In case ANYONE thinks I am saying this:
DO NOT SELECT GEARS TO IMPROVE DYNO RESULTS.
#1. I dont believe you can say that one car will be faster than another through any race without more than 30 hp difference in SAE dyno #s.
#2. Some people measure the influence of various parts on individual cars in a controlled environment (like me). This is good information for me so that I can measure things against before/after the gear change.
How to choose gear ratios in an M6 LS1:
Given traction, you will go the fastest through the 1/4 if you hit the top of your comfortable rev range (rev limiter for most of us) 1" after the finish lights of the 1/4 mile.
You will go fastest around a road track if you were 1 rpm from your rev limiter, in 4th prior to braking at the end of the fastest straight, as long as you do not have to go down beyond the bottom of your power curve, in 2nd, in the slowest corner. The M12 or whatever its called in the Z06 solves the insane 4th-5th gear ratio jump from the T56, and so this aversion to 5th on the road track is not as important for the Z06.
more relatively useless info <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
\chris
DO NOT SELECT GEARS TO IMPROVE DYNO RESULTS.
#1. I dont believe you can say that one car will be faster than another through any race without more than 30 hp difference in SAE dyno #s.
#2. Some people measure the influence of various parts on individual cars in a controlled environment (like me). This is good information for me so that I can measure things against before/after the gear change.
How to choose gear ratios in an M6 LS1:
Given traction, you will go the fastest through the 1/4 if you hit the top of your comfortable rev range (rev limiter for most of us) 1" after the finish lights of the 1/4 mile.
You will go fastest around a road track if you were 1 rpm from your rev limiter, in 4th prior to braking at the end of the fastest straight, as long as you do not have to go down beyond the bottom of your power curve, in 2nd, in the slowest corner. The M12 or whatever its called in the Z06 solves the insane 4th-5th gear ratio jump from the T56, and so this aversion to 5th on the road track is not as important for the Z06.
more relatively useless info <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
\chris
Re: Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10 It's interesting info, but as you said, this is for comparison purposes only. It just goes to show how many variables there can be in that magical #. Screw the dyno; take it to the track! <img border="0" alt="[Chevrolet]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" />
__________________
Re: Dyno'd HP loss 3.42 -> 4.10 </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Trevor D:
<strong>Screw the dyno; take it to the track! <img border="0" alt="[Chevrolet]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My thoughts exactly!
Terry, are you a dyno queen? I figure if you put out 435RWHP on the dyno, you ought to be able to out MPH me....and my measley Stage I heads & .535 lift cam.....correct? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
<small>[ March 22, 2002, 09:22 PM: Message edited by: Jantzer98SS ]</small>
<strong>Screw the dyno; take it to the track! <img border="0" alt="[Chevrolet]" title="" src="graemlins/camaro.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My thoughts exactly!
Terry, are you a dyno queen? I figure if you put out 435RWHP on the dyno, you ought to be able to out MPH me....and my measley Stage I heads & .535 lift cam.....correct? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
<small>[ March 22, 2002, 09:22 PM: Message edited by: Jantzer98SS ]</small>
Trending Topics
This thread is over 6 years old!!!! You seriously think you could have found an older one???
I doubt you're going to get any feedback on this one.. and it says "on the dyno"
I doubt you're going to get any feedback on this one.. and it says "on the dyno"
11 Second Club
iTrader: (32)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 2
From: Southaven, MS (near Memphis, TN)
