My catch can routing ok?
GL with your build!
run the side/exit to the intake manifold vac port right above it
1/2/3 valve cover ports connect to throttle body barb, my personal preference is to cap the drivers side in this situation, rotate the rear passenger port forward, and merge with passenger front port using a Y, but no real significance to performance.
norris can works pretty good in this configuration for stock / near stock airflow. (assuming authentic norris)
if / when you see oil blowing into the top of the throttle body from the valve cover(s) it is time to do more than the bare minimum.
I'm on a fresh build. Engine on a stand.
I'm doing fitment mocking and hose routing.
LS1 block with 927 LS6 valley cover.
Still have LS1 valve covers.
Mike Norris can
Fast 102/NW 102 with a hundred ports lol
Full disclosure, even after reading through 38 pages I'm still not "up to par" on this. Clean side, dirty side, all these routings. Just... Whatever lol.
I read that certain ports have to be plugged. And some can be tied together. Which further adds to my confusion.
So here's my setup and hopefully one of you gurus will chime in. I've also included pics.
I read that the rear drivers and rear passengers can be tied together, so that's what I did. The rtv was setting up, but I know this goes to the rear pass.
Mike Norris can. Didn't know about the inlet/outlet. So this is where I need help. I'm not sure where the front pass valve cover port will go to, Which port is to be plugged and which hose in the can goes to the valley port and manifold.
And the drivers side of the fast. I assume this one is to be plugged.
Thanks for the help guys.
Last edited by 5.7stroker; Apr 28, 2020 at 09:42 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
it sometimes has backfire prevention
and sometimes has boost checking / one way function
please show us your can. it may not be able to be hooked up how you are thinking


I tried both ways and it works much better than a PCV system, I lose less oil.
Adding a drain from the catch can back to the oil pan would make this even better. Condensation is not a factor worth considering if your oil temperature hits 212F or above. Which it should, regardless of crankcase system.
1. is not a pcv system. people and epa like the functions pcv provides
2. either flows less than stock, hooking to the valley does nothing in this configuration. usually performance enthusiasts seek items supporting hp increases
3. if you are going to go through with a catch can, might as well set it up the way that meets all of your goals, which is most likely never both of the above.


I tried both ways and it works much better than a PCV system, I lose less oil.
Adding a drain from the catch can back to the oil pan would make this even better. Condensation is not a factor worth considering if your oil temperature hits 212F or above. Which it should, regardless of crankcase system.
How will either of these setups flow less than stock?
What do you mean the valley cover does nothing? In my drawing I meant to imply there is no PCV valve anywhere.
Last edited by Sway Tale; Jun 2, 2020 at 08:38 PM.
I mean the valley cover was not designed to be a vent, so it is inherently not good at it and can cause more harm than good when used as one.










