Victor Jr VS Super victor

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 4, 2009 | 10:57 AM

5.3monte

Thread Starter

Teching In

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 23

Likes: 0

From: Minnesota

Victor Jr VS Super victor

I am putting together a carb 5.3 cam is 228/231 and 590/596 lift I dont remember exactly but its close to that. Which one would work better. I will be shaving the heads down as well to raise the compression.

Apr 4, 2009 | 11:29 AM

Z28/2002

11 Second Club

iTrader: (27)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 6,799

Likes: 5

From: Your girl's back door giving her the long stroke while you're at work

The Super Victor will be over kill in my opinion

Apr 4, 2009 | 11:45 AM

5.3monte

Thread Starter

Teching In

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 23

Likes: 0

From: Minnesota

I was kind of leaning that way, that it would be too much.

Apr 4, 2009 | 12:23 PM

h8tulooze

On The Tree

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 147

Likes: 0

From: Corona, CA

I am also going this route, what p/n you getting for your Vic Jr?

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...7&autoview=sku

Apr 4, 2009 | 03:39 PM

KCFormula

11 Second Club

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 922

Likes: 8

From: SoCal

Super Vic is the way to go if you don't care about cutting or don't have it in a fbody.

Apr 4, 2009 | 08:57 PM

SLowETz

10 Second Club

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 2,356

Likes: 2

From: Padded cell

KCF is right..... if you're not spinning the motor high, go Super Vic(2500-6500rpm operating range). The runners are longer, the plenum is larger, as the carb pad is taller, and will be better suited for lower RPM torque.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

The Vic Jr. has a 3500-7500RPM operating range, and a low rpm(NA)motor will be a dog down low, as well won't make power high enough up to take advantage of the high rpm operating range.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

Been there done it.
The graphs don't lie.

Reply Subscribe