Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Head choice and opinions needed.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2009, 04:16 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
vff_jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 282
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Head choice and opinions needed.

I have a Lq4/th400 stalled that I originally set up for boost.
it has ARP studs, rod bolts ect. Medium cam, turbo gapped rings, UD pulley ect.
Right now I have ported, polished 317 heads with chamber work, and milled .010.
I cant go turbo for a while, And I have a set of 706 truck heads also. But they are stock. Which ones should I run for best performance? I will be running stock manifolds, and have it SD tuned. 3.42 gears on a 30'' tire. In a 4k# truck.
I know My ported heads flow way way better, but would the small combustion chamber yield better performance?
Old 12-06-2009, 06:26 PM
  #2  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
vff_jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 282
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

wow. No one?
Old 12-08-2009, 06:45 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The smaller combustion chamber would give a higher compression ratio, but since the truck heads are stock the compression gain may be outweighed by the loss of flow. What cubic inch are you running?
Old 12-08-2009, 09:38 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Airflow > compression (see sig)
Old 12-09-2009, 06:41 AM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
vff_jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 282
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hemi2Slo
The smaller combustion chamber would give a higher compression ratio, but since the truck heads are stock the compression gain may be outweighed by the loss of flow. What cubic inch are you running?
6.0 or 364ci. Im still on the fence about this.

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
Airflow > compression (see sig)
So you think heads that flow 300/.600 lift but at a 9.5CR is better then heads that flow 226/.600 lift but have a 11.0CR? How much of a difference do you think there will be? Keep it coming guys. I want everyone's 2 cents.
Old 12-09-2009, 05:43 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
 
Hemi2Slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: A small town, MS
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With either of those cubic inch sizes the better head flow would do the most good. The low compression will hurt you a bit but the solution would be to have them milled a little farther, say to about .03 or .04. That would pick up your compression. Just be sure and get them angle milled, not flat cut.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.