LS6 or F.A.S.T Intake???

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 12, 2010 | 04:19 PM

#41

1sick-Z

TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 350

Likes: 0

From: In front of Mustangs

You will be wasting your money buying a FAST for a stock motor... unless you plan on cam/or heads and cam later down the road. For a stock motor a LS6 intake breathes plenty, the 1 to 5 hp you gain on the big end from the FAST that you wont even notice will just be taken away from your low end and hurt your driveability. Also it certainly does not justify spending more then triple the money for that intake, and not to mention the garbage TB they *** rape your wallet for.

May 12, 2010 | 04:22 PM

#42

Philip@HPE

Banned

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 176

Likes: 0

From: Houston, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Nothing

i'm gonna bring this thread back up lol i'm puttin stage II 243's on a LS6 block with a TR227/224 cam and i'm tryin to decide if i should get a LS6 intake for it or a FAST 102. i already am aware of the cost, i'm lookin more so for the hp and tq gain. tony mammo or ron from vengeance if you guys could chime it

I think it's been proven time and time again that a FAST cathedral intake will make more power on a modded car than a stock intake.