Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LQ4 Ls1 Pilot bearing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2010, 08:36 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LQ4 Ls1 Pilot bearing

I have a 06' LQ4 with an 02' T-56, I installed a new clutch and slave cylinder, bolted everything up, and dropped it in my car... I never touched the pilot bearing, and now that I think about it im not even sure if it had a pilot bearing, the tranny slid in super easy.. and the alignment tool was fairly loose (I know im a dumb *** )

This is the only picture I have before I bolted trans on
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55665137@N05/5273386778/
Is there any chance that the LQ4 had the correct pilot already in it.
Or should I 100% pull the motor back out, unbolt trans, check, and install a 2002 Camaro Pilot Bearing.
Thanks for your words of wisdom..
Old 12-20-2010, 09:30 AM
  #2  
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
 
-Joseph-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas and Qatar
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You'll need a pilot bearing, LQ4 and LQ9s never had a need for one. Get one for an '02 F-body LS1 application.
Old 12-20-2010, 11:52 AM
  #3  
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Damian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

/\ - Yep.

LQ engines were installed in vehicles with automatic transmissions. Therefor there was no need for a pilot bearing.
Old 12-20-2010, 05:27 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the clarification, I knew someone could give me a definitive answer. Looks like she's coming back out, AGAIN.
Old 12-20-2010, 05:40 PM
  #5  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Beau@SDPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have an 04 2500HD with a 6.0 and a crappy 5 spd manual trans. It uses the big pilot bearing for what its worth but that is because the input shaft of the trans is short.

I concur with the small pilot bearing. We have plenty to go around here!
Old 12-20-2010, 06:46 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
89 formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

and you can see its not there
Old 12-22-2010, 09:09 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Pulled the motor and it wasn't there (Glad i pulled it). I installed the new part with some finesse, the tranny is back on and in the car. Thanks
Old 01-09-2017, 03:49 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
DeathByNissan55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry for waking the dead,
I'm looking at same gen LQ4, but I have a 1994 T56 that I converted to LS using Rockland's adaptation kit (with mid plate and longer input and other things).

Rockland said I needed needle bearing from 93 camaro.....They made that whole kit so I'm inclined to believe them, but that sounds wrong, especially since you guys said like 02 camaro.
The kit was supposed to make it so that it allows this t56 to work on any LS style engine.

Also, if it makes a difference, I'm using the RXT twin clutch kit for LS1 from McLeod.

Please let me know



Quick Reply: LQ4 Ls1 Pilot bearing



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.