Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pro's & con's of solid engine mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2011 | 02:25 PM
  #21  
TheSilverOne's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 5
From: Taxachusetts
Default

spohn solids here and love them
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 12:43 PM
  #22  
yellowjacketfever's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
From: ardmore ok
Default

i have a 2004 gto with the tsp torquer 2 cam package, 238/248@50 600/605 112lsa and i want to know if it would be fesible to run the solid mounts. and what would i need to do to the car to accomodate them. thanks for your help...
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 08:21 AM
  #23  
soundengineer's Avatar
8 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 17
From: Chicago IL
Default

Originally Posted by yellowjacketfever
i have a 2004 gto with the tsp torquer 2 cam package, 238/248@50 600/605 112lsa and i want to know if it would be fesible to run the solid mounts. and what would i need to do to the car to accomodate them. thanks for your help...
I dont know why it wouldnt be feasible
I run a much wilder setup, 408/11.2:1 248/252 .649/.646 112+4
and I have no problems with my solid mounts

I bought the Spohn Tubular K-Member with the tubular Pedestal style mounts... weigh reduction and strength all in one package...
plus great fit and you will have more room to get to things on the underside of your vehicle

I dont know for certain if they make something the same for the GTO's... but solid mounts are definitely the way to go.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.