Magnaflow Article on True Duals with x-pipe
07-25-2004, 08:35 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Athens TN
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Magnaflow Article on True Duals with x-pipe I stumbled onto this article about true duals for a 5.0 Mustang
http://www.magnaflow.com/05news/magazine/05carcraft.htm
This makes me think that going with 3" mandrel bent tubing up to the X-pipe would be fine, then neck down to 2.5" after the x-pipe all the way back over the axle. They had to go bigger since they were using real mufflers which I doubt I would unless they were bullets. I really might consider this option since it would allow duals over the axle much easier and not be as restrictive as straight 2.5" duals off the headers back.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think this idea would flow very close to a true dual 3" over the axle.
http://www.magnaflow.com/05news/magazine/05carcraft.htm
This makes me think that going with 3" mandrel bent tubing up to the X-pipe would be fine, then neck down to 2.5" after the x-pipe all the way back over the axle. They had to go bigger since they were using real mufflers which I doubt I would unless they were bullets. I really might consider this option since it would allow duals over the axle much easier and not be as restrictive as straight 2.5" duals off the headers back.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think this idea would flow very close to a true dual 3" over the axle.
07-28-2004, 01:18 AM
#2
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Athens TN
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So am I wrong to thing that reducing from 3" to 2.5" after the X-pipe will not be a very large restriction on the exhaust?
I say that because by the exhuast gasses have reached the X they have cooled some and the volume is less. The velocity has also dropped, so by reducing the pipe size you keep velocity up without a real "restriction" compared to continuous 3" pipe.
Maybe I'm way off
This would be using no mufflers or Bullet mufflers unlike the real mufflers used in the article.
I say that because by the exhuast gasses have reached the X they have cooled some and the volume is less. The velocity has also dropped, so by reducing the pipe size you keep velocity up without a real "restriction" compared to continuous 3" pipe.
Maybe I'm way off
This would be using no mufflers or Bullet mufflers unlike the real mufflers used in the article.
07-28-2004, 04:37 AM
#3
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well don't they say that a 2.5" true dual system can accomodate around 450rwhp?? That being said, wouldn't a 3" to the X and then 2.5" out accomodate slightly more rwhp??
I'm going to do duals and I'm doing 3"-X-2.5" using small Magnaflows (not bullets though).
I'm going to do duals and I'm doing 3"-X-2.5" using small Magnaflows (not bullets though).
