k&n

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 8, 2005 | 04:33 PM

dudemandanman

Thread Starter

On The Tree

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 124

Likes: 0

k&n

is that k&n intake system really all its cracked up to be? i mean it does seem pretty ******* expensive. does anyone out there have one? i want to get a new intake and i'm debating over the k&n and the slp intake. so a little input is much appreciated.

May 8, 2005 | 06:07 PM

ynkssws6

TECH Resident

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 986

Likes: 0

From: NJ

personally, i think they look horrible, and i've read that it causes turbulence....how true that is i really dunno. Stick with the lid....cheaper and tried and true.

May 8, 2005 | 08:38 PM

armkneez8

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 999

Likes: 0

From: DOWKNEE, CA.

Go w/ the lid. Works like it's suppose 2 and it's cheaper than the K&N!

May 8, 2005 | 08:46 PM

cyphur

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 8,009

Likes: 0

From: North Texas

lol....anybody remember Cory Morgan? aka CT Morgan on this board. had a badass car(FASTech 370 and lots of n2o) and ran a FIPK. he ran low 10s? can't be that bad

i run one too, but its cuz i like how they look. they work as well as any lid IMHO.

May 8, 2005 | 08:58 PM

Redneck Z

TECH Addict

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 2,305

Likes: 2

From: Citrus Heights, CA

There's probably not a big performance difference between the FIPK and any of the lids. I would get the cheapest one that looks the best. I am of course partial to the SLP.