K&N vs. Holley
Unless you don't like to clean it...but at the same time cleaning your oiled filter lets you keep it almost forever, instead of buying papers every time it gets dirty.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Just do not oil the top of the filter and they will work great
I saw that display at a muffler shop. While it is impressive, the bottom line is does it equate to more hp. I don't think anyone has proven that a K&N is worth much on a dyno. If so, it would be a REAL small gain. The question is: Is an undetectable gain worth more junk getting into your motor. Oil analysis has shown that a K&N lets more contaminants into your motor. Also, some of the fastest cars on this site run paper filters.
There are pleated filters that filter better & flow better than K&N. Don't know why the discussion is always K&N vs paper. I wouldn't use either. Then someone will jump in with, "oh, I use a hydrostatic...blah, blah, blah & it's the best." Using a higher flowing filter will either increase power or VE. Either is a good reason to increase air flow or decrease the air restriction. Show me where the UOA indicates how much dirt it takes to negatively effect an engine or how changing the oil more often may reduce the effects of the increased amount of dirt. I also saw the paper test done on BITOG. This is LS1 Tech where guys run their engines to 7000 + RPMS & we're talking about the effects of a little dirt? Come on.
I choose to error on the side of caution, and give up the whole .25 hp. To each his own.






