Disappointed in Poor Quality of Hooker Long Tube Headers
I tried to save a few bucks over the FLP's by getting a set of coated Hookers and Mufflex Y pipe.
Hookers..........$560
Mufflex Y........$285
Mufflex Adapter..$ 35
Random Cats......$350
or $1230 retail FLP's are $1300 on sale last month they were $1100
I like the design of the Hookers better so the money isn't really the issue. However, the quality of the set of Hookers I got sucks!
Primaries needed slag ground down inside primary where joined to the flange.
Flange surfaces needed filing to make to smooth it out in a few places.
O2 bung welded in the wrong place. Have to grind out the metal because it's misaligned or the O2 sensor won't be in the exhaust stream. Well actually it's so badly aligned the O2 couldn't be screwed all the way in as 2/3 of the hole was covered.
1/4 inch gap that wasn't welded. Gap was so bad you could blow compressed air thru it!
Natually, all this repair work has ruined the coating in a few spots. If anyone is considering buying a set of Hookers, I suggest get the headers uncoated and clean this stuff up then send them back and get them coated.
I'd probably reccomend one of the other LT headers for people who want/need cats like you mentioned. I bought mine uncoated, and got their y-pipe so the whole deal with O2 extensions and new AIR & EGR tubes was less than $750.
Hookers are still a good bang for the buck LT for people like me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
I would send these things back get a set of FLP's or Quick Times if time allowed, but my heads and cam install is Saturday. My installer works in professional racing so, it's like do it this Saturday or wait until Feb. I've been waiting three years to do the heads and cam package, so I think we'll just fix my sorry set of Hookers and go forward. However, I'm not going to say anything nice about my low quality set of Hookers online or off. <img border="0" alt="[devil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
<strong>It's too bad you got a bad set, mine were fine <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />
I'd probably reccomend one of the other LT headers for people who want/need cats like you mentioned.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm sure there are good sets that don't have any issues out their, it's just a lack of quality control that my set got out. I think your right on the money about the cats. However, I may try my set up for a little while without the cats.
They fit the car like a glove and u get NO BANGING OF ANYKIND.IMO its the BEST non catted header out there to for the LS1 to date...
JS
<small>[ November 12, 2002, 11:30 PM: Message edited by: JS ]</small>
Trending Topics
PS-Also no banging probs. with the hookers.....unlike the FLP's <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong>Glad I ordered mine from Jet-Hot, I think they touch them up before they coat them. Mine looked great. <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My Hookers came direct from Jet Hot.
Mine looked great too! Nice finish very impressive to my inexperienced eye. I missed everyone of these problems. My installer <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" /> Jesse at <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" /> SRP Racing, took one look at them and very matter of factly pointed out one problem after another with my Hookers. Thing is once I saw what he was talking about it was perfectly obvious.
Mine were not touched up by Jet Hot, there too many things still wrong with them. I really don't think it's Jet Hot's responsibility to fix Hookers quality issues.
I'm very unhappy with the quality of the Hookers. With that said, I do think the design is good, that's why I choose them over the other brands.
Bottom line with this post is a warning to make sure you really check these things out before you install. If my Hookers had went on the car as is, they would have had to have been pulled right back off due a bad leak. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> The spot that caused the leak wasn't even welded and isn't accessible when the headers are on the car.
I'm very annoyed as the cheap-o BlackJack headers on my 72 Vette (for 17 years no leaks due to header quality) are of much better overall quality than my particular set of Hooker are <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" /> .
In any case, the headers go on the car Saturday.
It's very nice to see once they are on the car everyone seems to like them and have good results!
<img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
68LS1... 10.8@130 with that much power and torque? Why the discrepency between power and track performance?
Tim
<small>[ November 13, 2002, 12:28 PM: Message edited by: TimZ28 ]</small>
68LS1... 10.8@130 with that much power and torque? Why the discrepency between power and track performance?
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">He is still running stock rear end (4th one I think), gears and suspension. His 0-60ft times aren't good. It's a iron 382 with nitrous.
It will be FLP's next time around.
FLPs block the plug and I have seen them cook oil filters to the point of warping them. Can't be good for the oil!
Dave








