hooker 2254-1 vs.2469-1 whats the difference
hooker 2254-1 vs.2469-1 whats the difference hey iwas wandering if anybodys heard about the new hooker #2469-1 headers for f-body everywhere i called nobody seems to know much about them. hookers says thier the same but thinner tubing and better collector scavaging but their about 230 dollars cheaper than the 2254-1 any body who can help let me know also if anybody has put any on r thry as easy as the 2254-1 to install
Tech Resident
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
one, to my knowledge is a thinner, more cheaply made header. hooker took their original design and thinned it out a bit to compete with pacesetter - but don't quote me word for word on that.
what i DO know for sure is that they are a waste of money since pacesetter headers are superior to even the $600+ header hooker makes. all you'll be buying by going with hooker are the same performance gains, thinner flanges, a tougher install job and poorly placed O2 bungs. pacesetters should be your only option for coated headers (other than edelbrock, they make a SWEET header), and kooks/qtp should be your only option for stainless. anything else is just you thinking too hard.
what i DO know for sure is that they are a waste of money since pacesetter headers are superior to even the $600+ header hooker makes. all you'll be buying by going with hooker are the same performance gains, thinner flanges, a tougher install job and poorly placed O2 bungs. pacesetters should be your only option for coated headers (other than edelbrock, they make a SWEET header), and kooks/qtp should be your only option for stainless. anything else is just you thinking too hard.
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
one, to my knowledge is a thinner, more cheaply made header. hooker took their original design and thinned it out a bit to compete with pacesetter - but don't quote me word for word on that.
However, Hooker Comp 2468 and 2469 headers fit well.
