Kooks OR Pacesetters
pacesetters are the bang for the buck headers. they're the inexpensive, coated ones.
kooks are the high quality stainless steel ones.
the answer is simple. just answer this question: do you have the money for stainless steel headers?
if you don't have the money, pacesetters will do. they will show good gains, but eventually the coating will rust and flake.
kooks will last practically forever as they're stainless and very high quality. however, it's important to note that if bang-for-the buck is what you're after, QTP's will do the job better as they're as much of a quality header as kooks, but less expensive. take this as a rule of thumb:
- on a budget? go pacesetters
- want stainless and want a y-pipe setup? go kooks as their y-pipe is better.
- want stainless and want to go true duals? go QTP as they're less money, polished and have the best merge.
it's as simple as that.
I've also installed a set of Pacesetters on another friend's car, and they also went in easy and fit well.
If you want stainless, get the Kooks. That's why I got them. I've had good experiences with both (limited as it may be).
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I mean, I understand your desire to find a solid fit and comparitively yes, I think Kooks is the better side by side comparision. But the only TRUE difference is the stainless or not. Is that what your seeing?
Of course, your going to hear people say that one is better when you compare them, but I would advise you to take a step back and look at this objectively. I'm not saying this with 100% confidence, but I'm honestly reading alot on this and this is my take: the coating will do you just fine!
Have you seriously heard of ANYONE say that they bought pacesetters and they rusted and flaked away? Even to a point to notice any difference if you can find someone; even to that? My guess is, you may find people that say they "heard" about it, but not first hand. If your an enthusiast (your on this site!) you MAY notice a little rust over time, but that will be over a good period of time, and thats a MAYBE. 5 yrs, 7 yrs, 10 yrs? If you're half the enthusiast as the average person on here, you would relish the thought of, in 5 yrs, getting another mod done anyway, or just doing it for the experience to polish it if you're REALLY that worried about it. I don't know for sure 100%, but considering the price, I'm COMPLETELY comfortable going pacesetters and having the same performance gains, perhaps better with the coating...all for the "hearsay" of the naysayers, which is given their BEST scenario they can give you all the way around.
To the proponents that are saying "f*ck this guy", they will tell you Kooks. Its your take, but I seriously think unless you are really willing to make this a show car, or you've got the money, stainless on this IS NOT NECCESSARY or even better. But if you are that person who wants the piece of mind, I am by no means saying Kooks are bad. I'm just saying is it truly worth the extra piece of mind for a shine you won't see and a performance gain you won't notice. (If a tree falls in a forest..........)
Do what you want, this is just my .02. Of course, there are other opinions, some may correct me later, but their just more opinions (admittingly, some more educated than mine! -but both seem like really good choices) FWIW, these are my favorites too, along with perhaps QTP. Congrats either way, I'm sure you can be happy with both.
I mean, I understand your desire to find a solid fit and comparitively yes, I think Kooks is the better side by side comparision. But the only TRUE difference is the stainless or not. Is that what your seeing?
Of course, your going to hear people say that one is better when you compare them, but I would advise you to take a step back and look at this objectively. I'm not saying this with 100% confidence, but I'm honestly reading alot on this and this is my take: the coating will do you just fine!
Have you seriously heard of ANYONE say that they bought pacesetters and they rusted and flaked away? Even to a point to notice any difference if you can find someone; even to that? My guess is, you may find people that say they "heard" about it, but not first hand. If your an enthusiast (your on this site!) you MAY notice a little rust over time, but that will be over a good period of time, and thats a MAYBE. 5 yrs, 7 yrs, 10 yrs? If you're half the enthusiast as the average person on here, you would relish the thought of, in 5 yrs, getting another mod done anyway, or just doing it for the experience to polish it if you're REALLY that worried about it. I don't know for sure 100%, but considering the price, I'm COMPLETELY comfortable going pacesetters and having the same performance gains, perhaps better with the coating...all for the "hearsay" of the naysayers, which is given their BEST scenario they can give you all the way around.
To the proponents that are saying "f*ck this guy", they will tell you Kooks. Its your take, but I seriously think unless you are really willing to make this a show car, or you've got the money, stainless on this IS NOT NECCESSARY or even better. But if you are that person who wants the piece of mind, I am by no means saying Kooks are bad. I'm just saying is it truly worth the extra piece of mind for a shine you won't see and a performance gain you won't notice. (If a tree falls in a forest..........)
Do what you want, this is just my .02. Of course, there are other opinions, some may correct me later, but their just more opinions (admittingly, some more educated than mine! -but both seem like really good choices) FWIW, these are my favorites too, along with perhaps QTP. Congrats either way, I'm sure you can be happy with both.
If you have any questions, give us a call at 443-730-9428. We are one of the biggest Kooks dealers in the country, and currently have these headers on sale (both Kooks and Pacesetter).
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Just need to round up some more cash and then its Mods Away!


