Pacesetter Vs. Jet Hot

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 28, 2007 | 08:59 AM

1BadBlueSS

Thread Starter

Teching In

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 45

Likes: 0

Pacesetter Vs. Jet Hot

Im about to buy one of the two but cant decide which one to get. I like how the jet hots ar coated inside and out so is worth the little bit more money to go with them. Also id the fitment the same as the pacesetters? I live on Long Island so i need a set of long tubes that rust away in on year since it is a DD at this time. By the way i cant afford Kook's or QTP's.

Apr 28, 2007 | 12:08 PM

Raise

TECH Addict

iTrader: (31)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,152

Likes: 0

From: Virginia Beach, Va

well, marylandspeed.com has a killer deal on the pacesetters with jet hot coating in/out right now. i dont know how much the inner coating will help with performance, but it will definitely keep your engine bay temperature down a bit. pacestters fit like a glove, im not sure about jet hots. u cant go wrong with either, but i know from experience, and im talking about a dozen header installs, pacesetters are the best bang for the buck around!!!

Apr 28, 2007 | 01:57 PM

JZ'sTA

Banned

iTrader: (23)

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 3,126

Likes: 2

From: Ft. Myers Fl

Both are very good headers.
I would do the pacesetters and spend the 200 you save on another part.

Apr 28, 2007 | 02:05 PM

2_wacko

TECH Veteran

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 4,274

Likes: 0

From: WestTexas

So many people have been very happy with pacesetters including me.

Apr 28, 2007 | 02:12 PM

patriotformula

12 Second Club

iTrader: (28)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 858

Likes: 0

From: Quad Cities, IA

I like my pacesetters... They're no Kooks, but like they said, for the price theres no comparison. The added performance for your 200 will be very minimal if any.

Reply Subscribe