1BadBlueSS

Im about to buy one of the two but cant decide which one to get. I like how the jet hots ar coated inside and out so is worth the little bit more money to go with them. Also id the fitment the same as the pacesetters? I live on Long Island so i need a set of long tubes that rust away in on year since it is a DD at this time. By the way i cant afford Kook's or QTP's.

Raise

iTrader: (31)

well, marylandspeed.com has a killer deal on the pacesetters with jet hot coating in/out right now. i dont know how much the inner coating will help with performance, but it will definitely keep your engine bay temperature down a bit. pacestters fit like a glove, im not sure about jet hots. u cant go wrong with either, but i know from experience, and im talking about a dozen header installs, pacesetters are the best bang for the buck around!!!

JZ'sTA

iTrader: (23)

Both are very good headers.
I would do the pacesetters and spend the 200 you save on another part.

2_wacko

iTrader: (2)

So many people have been very happy with pacesetters including me.

patriotformula

iTrader: (28)

I like my pacesetters... They're no Kooks, but like they said, for the price theres no comparison. The added performance for your 200 will be very minimal if any.