Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

new style of plugs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #21  
JonB's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 704
Likes: 3
From: Orange Park FL
Default

Originally Posted by TheSilverOne
marketing brings in the suckers.
That pretty much sums it up.

Every ricer will be running to get them. With there tornado, velocity stack and these plugs there gonna gain 50 whp and 10mpg.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #22  
SS101's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

personally, i think this thread is useless without an independant dyno test
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #23  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by SS101
well...what the plug does, from what i can tell, is it takes the energy released by the coil and stores it. the reason is simple: when the coil releases the energy it does it gradually, like slowly tipping over a bucket. as the energy is being released, the spark slowly builds on the electrode of the spark plug until it reaches its peak then a spark is discharged. the pulse plug stores this gradual release and dumps it all at onces. imagine two buckets, slowly empty the first bucket (coil) into the second (plug) and then quickly invert the second bucket (plug)...the water comes out much faster and all at once, but it's the same amount of water. luder[pak9] has it right, the spark has much more power, but it last for a much shorter length of time. just like the bucket analogy, the same amount of water, just much faster. its the same AMOUNT of electricity, it's just released much faster, ergo, making more power.
dude, go spend $200 on them then say **** like that or

electricity is not ******* water! your analogy and rationalization is

electricity goes at one speed on a medium, whether it be copper, the spark plug wire, or the air across the gap of the spark plug. And it cannot go faster than the speed of light. Ever hear of einstein? It doesn't matter wtf you do before the electrode gap. once the voltage is high enough at the electrode the spark and all that energy will travel across the gap, it is an open ******* circuit. That's it.

And the coil doesn't dump energy gradually, you idiot. How the **** do you consider that gradual?

For the dumbass who said the spark plug acts like an extra coil pack, if you knew anything about how a coil works, you'd realize how freakin stupid that is!! Go read wikipedia!

a coil can only discharge so much energy each time it's triggered and it's based on how much power you input to the coil (voltage and current) and the size and shape of the coil and how it manages the magnetic field it creates. It does not create power, it only changes the voltage. It's a transformer. If you input 15 volts and 10 amps into the coil, that's 150 watts. Even if the damn thing was 100% efficient and that 150 watts made it to the spark at the plug electrode (pulstar says on average it's only 25 watts), how the **** is the spark plug going to generate 999850 watts to make a 1 million watt spark?
1 watt of power per second = 1 joule of energy. The time the spark happens is fixed, you cannot make it happen faster and have a smaller number for time on that side of the equation and then say you have more watts. It doesn't work like that. Read a book on electricity or electronics. start with v=ir. then when you go "but 1FMF...." go stick your finger in a wall socket, that's 120 volts at 20amp max because your breaker in the fuse box should be 20 amp, hopefully it's 20 and not 15 amp breaker because I want the max current to flow. Barring loss in the wire and the resistance of your skin, it'll be 2400 watts hopefully shocking some intelligence into you. If you have any common sense, you'll know that'll happen in less than a second, but lets say it does take exactly 1 second, then that's 2400 joules of energy. Hopefully you can hold on for 10 seconds before you croak, that'll be 24000 joules.

do you have electricity at your house? How many kilowatt-hours you using per day? Say your a pig at 1000 kwh per month, that's 33 kwh per day. I'll use 40 kwh per day. 1 kwh = 3600 joules. 40 kwh = 144000 joules.

i think the current and the voltage work out tho...what's so impossible about a million watt spark, that's only one thousand kilojoules of energy per second...that's not all that much really in terms of electrical energy
you say one thousand kilojoules, that's a million. So your spark plug fires with almost 10x more energy than your house uses in a whole freaking day?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #24  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

**** i screwed up on the numbers comparing daily usage to your home, it's 1 watt-hour = 3600 J. 1 kwh = 3600000 Joules, so instead of 10x more energy per day, each plug firing would be like 1/4 the daily power usage of you home.

it was funnier the other way, but then my number's would be like pulstar's numbers and I'd have to kill myself.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #25  
$750 L98's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

It's just condensing the energy before it releases it - It's just a refinement, why is that hard to believe?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 06:23 PM
  #26  
oneBADDz's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Western Section
Default

Originally Posted by $750 L98
It's just condensing the energy before it releases it - It's just a refinement, why is that hard to believe?
Because they are making claims that are untrue, period. It can not is any way make mroe power than it being put into it and they are 100% claiming that it does
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #27  
KillerZO6's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

so by the time the plug build up all that power, i would think that it could have already sparked, cuase it still has to wait on the coil to release all the energy so all your geting is a more powerfull spark but it not going to be as fast as if the spark plug sparked as soon as it got some juice
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #28  
KillerZO6's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

those plugs might make that much power if the hooked them up to the hover damn
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #29  
$750 L98's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

It just seems to me that if they were making those claims, and not a bit of truth to them - there would be a lawsuit. Pulse energy may not make your car an instant hot rod, but even with the test they were required to put it through shows that. Some one mentioned that the coil pack is a transformer, which steps electrical current up or down depending on the windings - I'm not an electrical engineer but i wouldn't be so quick to call BS. If nothing else it seems like a fair attempt to reduce the amount of unburnt fuel in the exhaust. It takes advantage of smaller components build within the plug that allow it to effectively store up and rapidly release energy in one quick burst - that's what pulse capacitors do.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #30  
KillerZO6's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

they can make those claims becuase ther not saying what is powering the spark plug to make that kind of power, it like heads,LT,cams they tune the car for peak power and have the bolt ons to make max power for that part, then they claim that a cam = 60 or LT = 50 hp and on top of that most time that to the flywheel
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #31  
Luder[PAK9]'s Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1 FMF
**** i screwed up on the numbers comparing daily usage to your home, it's 1 watt-hour = 3600 J. 1 kwh = 3600000 Joules, so instead of 10x more energy per day, each plug firing would be like 1/4 the daily power usage of you home.

it was funnier the other way, but then my number's would be like pulstar's numbers and I'd have to kill myself.
you also need to learn the difference between volts and watts. The claims is that the plug creates a 1 million VOLT spark, not 1 million watts.

Voltage = the ability to overcome resistance. The higher the voltage, the easier the electricity can travel through the ignition system and cross the gap in the plug. The easier electricity can travel, the faster it can travel. Electricity cannot travel faster than light, you are correct. But electricity traveling through copper is not traveling at the speed of light.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #32  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by Luder[PAK9]
you also need to learn the difference between volts and watts. The claims is that the plug creates a 1 million VOLT spark, not 1 million watts.

oh contrair mon frair:
http://www.pulstarplug.com/howtheywork.html
Pulse plugs incorporate a pulse circuit, which stores incoming electrical energy from the ignition system and releases the stored energy in a powerful pulse of power. Instead of 50 watts of peak power typical of all spark plugs, pulse plugs deliver up to 1 million watts of peak power. So where does the pulse plug get its incredible power?
it was 1 million watts they are claiming,

i have an electrical engineering background, that's why i'm about it especially when people try to support it with their own claim of electrical understanding. Fact is, watt is unit of power, and I hoped to have described amounts of power that could be understood but everybody wants to believe there is some truth in this marketing claim.
they are playing on your ignorance, twisting technical knowledge in a range of ignorance which many people have, to sell their product. And because it cannot be easily disproved, or better said there's a window of opportunity for it to be true because most people don't have technical knowledge regarding it, they fall for it because that's the way people are- they will hope for it to be true rather than dismiss it as false.



What is condensing energy? It's hard to believe because I don't understand it, and I like to think I know electricity. I've studied enough about it and have somewhat of a career around it. You don't condense electricity like you condense water vapor back into liquid. What is condensing electricity?


you're very naive and foolish if you think fear of lawsuits will keep the marketplace honest. That is so far from reality. It's all about money! They could claim 1.21 jigawatts of power, ain't nobody going to sue them. It would cost to much to sue and what reward is there? Nobody gonna pay $10,000+ for a lawsuit just to disprove a marketing claim. There is no damage done, and in fact their claim is "up to 1 million watts of power". That's there out if anything, key words "up to".

The higher the voltage, the easier the electricity can travel through the ignition system and cross the gap in the plug. The easier electricity can travel, the faster it can travel. Electricity cannot travel faster than light, you are correct. But electricity traveling through copper is not traveling at the speed of light.
this is not entirely true and largely out of context concerning the subject. Yes, electricity will never go faster than light, and most times it is much slower than the speed of light, it depends on the medium like i had said. But higher voltage does not mean electricity will travel easier resulting in it travelling faster. Resistance is what determines "how easy" "electrical current" can travel through a medium. But you have to watch your vocabulary and define what you mean by electricity. In this case it's the movement of electrons across a conductor, then across an airspace which is different. You get into electric fields, ionization, a bunch of physics I don't care to understand and won't say that i will. But I seriously doubt it will speed up the flow off energy. Even if it did, it's irrelevant. They say the pulse circuit accumulates energy, so where does it come from? It's a bogus claim.

Here is pulstar's explanation from their site:

Pulse plugs incorporate a pulse circuit, which stores incoming electrical energy from the ignition system and releases the stored energy in a powerful pulse of power. Instead of 50 watts of peak power typical of all spark plugs, pulse plugs deliver up to 1 million watts of peak power. So where does the pulse plug get its incredible power?

When the ignition signal is sent to a traditional spark plug, it begins to ionize the spark gap. This means that the voltage builds in the gap until a spark can be formed. During this ionization phase, which lasts about 5 millionths of a second, the incoming voltage (which has nowhere to go) heats up ignition components including the spark plug. This is wasted energy. When the ignition voltage overcomes the resistance in the spark gap, the spark is created with an initial discharge of approximately 50 watts. Once created, the spark resides between the electrodes at very low power for over a period of 30 millionths of a second.

What is different about a pulse plug is that instead of heating ignition parts during the ionization phase, this energy is stored in the integral circuit inside the pulse plug. When the ignition power overcomes the resistance in the spark gap, the pulse circuit discharges all of its accumulated power - 1 million watts - in 2 billionths of a second!
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 10:39 PM
  #33  
KillerZO6's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

so there trying to say that all the heat created by the spark that only last for 30 millionths of a second is stored to create 1 million watts. im sure there no where near enough energy wasted by that small amount of heat to create 1 million watts let alone a 100
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #34  
$750 L98's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

In theory it's cool, It is just a capacitor built into the plug itself - which simply store up the entirety of the energy from the coils then releases all of it at once. By the looks of what i've read....it seems like there is some other variable in the way the consider it a "1 million watt" plug - maybe they are measuring light intensity? 50 watts of light intensity would seem about right for the light a spark plug puts off, while something white hot like the "1 million watt" pulse could i suppose be 1 million watts of light intensity - sort of like the measurement of those 1 million candlepower torch lights? Just a thought.

I also read of people using capacitors inline before the spark plugs to achieve a similar effect, as well as hearing about nology plug wires. Not a HUGE performance gain, but possibly response and emissions conscious.

"Spark plugs waste energy by heating ignition components before the spark occurs. Pulse plugs capture wasted energy with a pulse circuit and then release the captured energy into and beyond the spark gap. When the ignition power overcomes the resistance in the spark gap, the pulse circuit discharges all of its accumulated power - 1 million watts - in 2 billionths of a second!"

This is why theory and adding complexity to simple things is a never ending battle.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2007 | 11:52 PM
  #35  
$750 L98's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: Round Rock, Texas
Default

OK I found some evidence so we can kill this thread:

Looks like they ARE comparing light intensity and not the actual ELECTRICAL pulse, the EPA also found a meager 2.7% increase in fuel mileage - that could be from a simple real world variable like a headwind in one test LOL.

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006...plug_demo.html

What makes Pulstar different from spark plugs is its built-in capacitor, which stores the ignition’s electrical power and then discharges it in an intense plasma ball. Pulstar is capable of delivering up to 10,000 times the power of an average spark plug, which translates into greater fuel efficiency, increased torque and horsepower and reduced hydrocarbon emissions. In fact, spark plugs can be compared to the LOW-POWER output of a FLASHLIGHT, while pulse plugs generate intense power like the BRIGHTNESS emitted from a camera’s flash bulb.
—Daniel Parker, ENERPULSE CEO
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #36  
blueeyeddevil141's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SS101
well...what the plug does, from what i can tell, is it takes the energy released by the coil and stores it. the reason is simple: when the coil releases the energy it does it gradually, like slowly tipping over a bucket. as the energy is being released, the spark slowly builds on the electrode of the spark plug until it reaches its peak then a spark is discharged. the pulse plug stores this gradual release and dumps it all at onces. imagine two buckets, slowly empty the first bucket (coil) into the second (plug) and then quickly invert the second bucket (plug)...the water comes out much faster and all at once, but it's the same amount of water. luder[pak9] has it right, the spark has much more power, but it last for a much shorter length of time. just like the bucket analogy, the same amount of water, just much faster. its the same AMOUNT of electricity, it's just released much faster, ergo, making more power.

the faster, more powerful, and hotter spark will discharge it's heat to the air/fuel mixture, the hotter the spark, the hotter the flame it creates AND the faster the flame front propogates (the volume of fuel/air burns faster). if all that happens, then the cylinder pressure is increased, just as they claim, because the air/fuel mixture is being converted to exhaust gas faster than expected in the same area as it would have expanded slowly with a regular spark. it's generating more force over the same area which equals higher pressure which *should* create more torque for the same amount of air/fuel burnt.

not to worry, the engine won't interpret a knock. a "knock" is the sound (audible ping or knock) that is caused by two flame fronts colliding. when an engine knocks, what usually happens is the air/fuel mixture starts to burn before the spark plug ignites (usually because there's too much compression for that grade of gasoline), which creates one flame front. when the spark plug sets of remainder of the air fuel mixture, creating another flame front, the two front collide and generate a knocking noise so loud that it can be heard in the passenger compartment. with all of that said, knock sensors detect the sound of a knock, not the actual pre-ignition itself.
I actually came up with the same explanation...

I still don't believe their BS claims of power though. But I do believe that is how it works, I just don't see a big hp gain.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 01:14 AM
  #37  
RevGTO's Avatar
Pontiacerator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,216
Likes: 236
From: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by SS101
the faster, more powerful, and hotter spark will discharge it's heat to the air/fuel mixture, the hotter the spark, the hotter the flame it creates AND the faster the flame front propogates (the volume of fuel/air burns faster).
This is how I understand it. The spark IGNITES the fuel mixture; it doesn't BURN it. The system needs only enough spark to create IGNITION. A hotter spark doesn't create "greater" ignition, nor does it burn the mixture faster or more thoroughly. The only amount of spark needed is the amount to create ignition. Automotive engineers understand what they're doing and specify plugs that will create proper ignition for a given application.

Going back to old school, it's like the guys who replaced their points style ignitions with "hot coils" or HEI's, thinking it would make "more power" because the spark is "hotter." There may be other benefits, but more power isn't one of them.

Correct me if and explain why I am wrong ...
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:16 AM
  #38  
LS7jUnKiE's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...hlight=pulstar

Dyno tests were done on corvette forum months ago....they compared Pulstar to NGK 55 and saw that the Pulstar plugs sped up the burn like they stated but in the higher compression LS motors it caused knock and therefore timing retard....read for yourself, test was done at a sponsers shop here in Tampa.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #39  
SS101's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
This is how I understand it. The spark IGNITES the fuel mixture; it doesn't BURN it. The system needs only enough spark to create IGNITION. A hotter spark doesn't create "greater" ignition, nor does it burn the mixture faster or more thoroughly. The only amount of spark needed is the amount to create ignition. Automotive engineers understand what they're doing and specify plugs that will create proper ignition for a given application.

Going back to old school, it's like the guys who replaced their points style ignitions with "hot coils" or HEI's, thinking it would make "more power" because the spark is "hotter." There may be other benefits, but more power isn't one of them.

Correct me if and explain why I am wrong ...
the hotter spark makes the flame front propogate faster through the cylinder. the higher temperature spark creates a higher temperature burn, the higher the temperatures on the perimeter of the flame front, the faster it spreads.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #40  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

hahahahahahahaha

great f'ing dyno report, reading page 1 of that thread a 2006 bone stock C6 corvette only puts down 306 rwhp then 313 rwhp with pulstar plugs

my 2002 ss stock put down 328 rwhp last year when i dyno'd it, that's an LS1 comparing to what an LS2? something's not right, that dyno don't mean jack.

furthermore, almost all latter dyno pulls will always show higher numbers because all the fluids are hotter (engine oil, transmission, differential) and with lower viscosity you will dyno slightly higher numbers. I did 5 pulls with my car, with 10-15 minutes wait in between but with the car still running. I have an oil temp gauge, running 5w-40 oil my 4th and 5th pull were the highest, and that was when my engine oil temps were 220F, versus starting at around 180F oil temp on pull #1. Way too many variables with everybody's dyno tests! Nobody controls anything! If they do a baseline pull with pulstar then swap in some cheapo champion plugs you will most likely put down higher dyno numbers on the champions.

The spark knock, if it really was caused by the pulstar plug, is probably due to it's heat range being hotter than the oem plug. BUT, it's a head/cam car, all the knock problems are probably because of the tune (when are they never?) if not the parts on the car. How are you to know? Use a stock car that hasn't been modified or tuned so can be sure of reliable performance! Read further down in that thread and you'll see posts of how the dyno numbers are worthless.


REVGTO makes a very good point, the spark doesn't do the work, the expansion of gas from the combustion of fuel does, look at the big picture. Once the spark is sufficient enough, anymore power in the spark isn't going to result in more power from combustion. That spark always happens at the same point in space and combustion (flame front whatever buzz word you want to use to complicate the issue with) always happens the same. What influences combustion is temperature within the cylinder, a/f mixture, how homogenous the mix is, and cylinder head/piston design. Actually what influences things the most is what fuel you burn, and what cylinder pressures you have! The spark plug is a waste of money, but they will always market on the idea of a hotter spark = more power, hot = power, hot = energy and people through ignorance will agree with that. And if it's advertised and they have a whole website with all these test, how could any of it not be true
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE