Aluminum vs plastic intake
-nate
don't let people fool you into thinking that it's all about personal preference - there really is a best choice. now whether that choice and your budget line up is the question.
now for wear the heat could affect performance yes the air moves fast but where does that air come from for most its not outside the car its under the hood therefore hot metal would raise the ambient temperature in the engine compartment (in theory) therfore the air coming into the intake would be warmer if the engine bay air temp is high, when the car is setting in a staging lane that heat has no where to go until it is sucked through the engine and eventually i am sure that the air under the hood would cycle through and come very close to outside car temps but how close would be the question.
so i would think if you have a possibility of reducing overall engine bay temps i would think that would have more of a sway on hp as aposed to being concerned with the part itself becoming hot, as someone stated inside the manifold it probably has a very slim chance of affecting air temp due to the speed of the air traveling, but could possibly affect the overall temp of all of the air the engine gets by warming the area surrounding it
It's personal preference. Yea, the intake might hold some more heat, but it's not gonna effect HP at WOT. It'll only heat the air minimally if your in stop & go traffic. At WOT there is too much air flowing thru the intake for it to heat the air temps.
If you think the air will be heated enough to hurt performance when it matters, which is at WOT, then you should also complain about Aluminum heads cause the air is in there just as long as it is the intake.
Of coarse there will be people on both sides of the fence on this issue but in the end the result of these threads always come back to user preference. Composite intakes are great for N/A applications, but if your gonna run boost or nitrous I'd suggest a Aluminum for their added strength & modification ability.
Robert
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
There has to be just as many advantages & disadvantages to each seeing as how most guys running in the sub 10 second catagory run sheet metal intakes. Not composite.
But I still stand by my first post.
Composite for a N/A application
Aluminum for boosted or nitrous
Thats why I went Aluminum. I had it all port/polished out & matched to my port/polished heads. Needless to say a decent amount of material has been removed from my Aluminum intake so it should out flow the LS6 at this point. My TB was also ported out to the max & the intake done to match. I also plan on running a 100-150 dry later. Thats the extra versitility advantage of the Aluminum. You can do alot more with them in the end, but again it all falls on personal choice when its all said & done.
you didnt happen to do the oldest mod in the book the old TB bypass mod did you...... if so doesnt that toally go agains all your arguments. i mean keeping that little ol TB from getting hot so that the air doesnt get hot and drop power thats just redickulus right. i mean hell that big ol massive chunk of alum, that wont heat air hell no. just like at work those big oil burning heaters that have metal coils that get hot and then a huge fan blows air past them and wooh weird the air gets warm.....hummmmm or like the radiator on your car when the fans turn out all this is radiant heat think about it the air no matter how fast it moves through a heated metal intake will absorb some amount of heat.
plus you cannot compare a sheetmetal intake to a CAST HEAT SINK of an intake the alum ones are. a sheetmetal intake is super thin in comparo and acts like the old "air gap intakes" that most of us know about and those are proven to make more power that a stock none air gap one.
so i guees you just get whatever its not like use f-body guys wanna go fast right
I think that the weight thing will not change anything in the way your car performs. Its more that no aluminiun intake has done better than the FAST.You get what you pay for. They look better but the FAST looks cool too IMO. Its all about if you wanna pay for the FAST 90 setup or not....
Why everyone's is putting a FAST on top of their stroker?...because its the best IMO. Its all about the $$$$
It's personal preference. Yea, the intake might hold some more heat, but it's not gonna effect HP at WOT. It'll only heat the air minimally if your in stop & go traffic. At WOT there is too much air flowing thru the intake for it to heat the air temps.
If you think the air will be heated enough to hurt performance when it matters, which is at WOT, then you should also complain about Aluminum heads cause the air is in there just as long as it is the intake.
Of coarse there will be people on both sides of the fence on this issue but in the end the result of these threads always come back to user preference. Composite intakes are great for N/A applications, but if your gonna run boost or nitrous I'd suggest a Aluminum for their added strength & modification ability.
Have to respectfully disagree....we have done far to much controlled testing to even consider an AL intake. They look pretty, but thats it. Only on our Alky 1,000 HP big cubes do we use AL (the Alky cools it enough that the block can be filled for strentgh & still not over heat).
I think that the weight thing will not change anything in the way your car performs. Its more that no aluminiun intake has done better than the FAST.You get what you pay for. They look better but the FAST looks cool too IMO. Its all about if you wanna pay for the FAST 90 setup or not....
Why everyone's is putting a FAST on top of their stroker?...because its the best IMO. Its all about the $$$$
Absolutely! We see the same gains & more w/the FAST. But on a FI build, we use a ported LS2 & our billet TB.
I think that the weight thing will not change anything in the way your car performs. Its more that no aluminiun intake has done better than the FAST.You get what you pay for. They look better but the FAST looks cool too IMO. Its all about if you wanna pay for the FAST 90 setup or not....
Why everyone's is putting a FAST on top of their stroker?...because its the best IMO. Its all about the $$$$
thats a no sh%% i know my fast looks lile a plain ol jane fast but i know its a 1600$ ported BAD mother
I surprised no one has mentioned this yet, Even if heat soak did have an effect on performance, I think the sheet metal intake would cool down almost instantly compared to a heavy cast aluminum intake that would definitely store a lot more energy in heat. I do believe heat soak has a small effect though. just my $.02
Robert
New tech for an old motor, a 511ci Olds, and all runs are/were n/a. Shoot out between High-Tech EFI and Classic Carb setups. The combatants, Torker and the Victor.
Torker and carb: 697tq and 727hp
Torker and EFI: 700tq and 738hp
Victor and Carb: 703tq and 745hp
Victor and EFI: 713tq and 757hp
The Victor had it's hp peak at 6500rpm, which was a higher rpm than the other combos. Remember this is a big block and a higher winding small block would take these numbers to a higher range for peak numbers. The Vic Jr is good to 8000rpm in stock form. What will we see from some ported and matched heads/cam combos from someone who is building with a single plane in mind such as the Vic, and drag racing as the goal? I think we have not yet seen the whole story here. Time will tell, and the Vic will easily support 600hp n/a.
Anyway, I just thought I would throw this out there for further comments.
Robert















