News on AFR heads
Does a stock displacement LS1/LS6 have enough displacement to take advantage of the LSX and the AFR's?
Given the differences in flow benches, my admittedly uninformed opinion would be that they aren't demonstrating a significant advantage over the Patriot LS6 style heads... which are $1000 less.
Get them under $2000 for the CNC ported 205's and you might have something there, but at this point I honestly can't see why I would get worked up about them given what else is currently available.
Would some experts chime in and tell me where I have this wrong?
Given the differences in flow benches, my admittedly uninformed opinion would be that they aren't demonstrating a significant advantage over the Patriot LS6 style heads... which are $1000 less.
Get them under $2000 for the CNC ported 205's and you might have something there, but at this point I honestly can't see why I would get worked up about them given what else is currently available.
Would some experts chime in and tell me where I have this wrong?
Even then there better be some pretty significant gains to justify the extra $1000.
Given the differences in flow benches, my admittedly uninformed opinion would be that they aren't demonstrating a significant advantage over the Patriot LS6 style heads... which are $1000 less.
Get them under $2000 for the CNC ported 205's and you might have something there, but at this point I honestly can't see why I would get worked up about them given what else is currently available.
Would some experts chime in and tell me where I have this wrong?
Even then there better be some pretty significant gains to justify the extra $1000.
The thing with heads is that there is a fine balance between volume and velocity- you need a head that is going to provide enough air volume (read: big port), but you need that same port to provide as high of a charge velocity as possible (read: small port). The answer?? An efficiently shaped port of moderate volume. This also explains why bigger motors work well with large ports than smaller motors do... because for a given RPM level (read: piston speed), the bigger motor will have more "suck" with which to induce speed in the intake port. A smaller motor would need to be wound tighter (read: higher piston speed) in order to achieve the same result.
I understand the concepts you outlined and agree with you. Which is why I feel a dyno test or a track test will be the only way to do these heads any justice.
Wow, 40-45 RWHP gain over a stock LS6 head on a 5.7?? That would be awesome because we just had a cam only Z06 make 417 RWHP and with the best we have seen from anyone elses ported LS6 Z06 being 442 RWHP that would put your little head at 457-462 RWHP.
Sorta sounds like a bold statement considering you guys haven't dyno tested these things. It will be interesting to see.
Regards, Brian Tooley
Jay's ports are based on a smallest volume to achieve the highest flow.I cant wait to see what a set of your 200 cc,that outflow LS6 heads already,will do when finished by Jay.I am going to say that Jays new port will be around 205 cc when finished.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I wouldn't really call Brian a competitor as TEA does not make their own heads. Also they do port existing AFR offerings for customers. I would think he has a stake in this as when a customer does send a set of LS1 AFR heads to TEA they will have to far exceed the numbers claimed by AFR for their heads when the port work is done to keep their customers happy. I would think of AFR as more of a vendor of heads for TEA to offer their heads in staged versions. Hopefully the AFR LS1s are a great tool for both AFR and TEA.
Jess
It will be nice if the AFR's are the cat's meow because they'll only get better over time as new ports, valve jobs, dyno testing & track data etc are collected.






