Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: which cam with 706 heads?????
torquer v.2
21
63.64%
tick polluter
12
36.36%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

polluter or torquer v.2, with 5.3 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2009, 02:51 PM
  #21  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
tillery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

TQr V2 sounds better for the street. It does very well at the track too. If my car stays more of a DD I would look into a cam around this duration and lift. Im driving the MS3 with all supporting mods,IE FAST 92/92 1 7/8 headers duals BLA BLA. Its not fun in stop and go traffic. I have a good tune, but would like more power down low.
Old 02-24-2009, 07:45 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
chris23120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.3 heads
Old 02-24-2009, 08:52 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
synisterC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah 5.3 heads with 2.02 in valves. flows around 280cfm with a hand port job.
Old 03-07-2009, 03:53 AM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,558
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tillery
TQr V2 sounds better for the street. It does very well at the track too. If my car stays more of a DD I would look into a cam around this duration and lift. Im driving the MS3 with all supporting mods,IE FAST 92/92 1 7/8 headers duals BLA BLA. Its not fun in stop and go traffic. I have a good tune, but would like more power down low.
I feel the same way. I was going to buy a buddies MS4 but decided to go with a smaller 23x/23x cam I had spec'd by Pat G
Old 03-07-2009, 07:39 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
second_2_none's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i love my ms4! however, wont work with your set up. i really dout the polluter will work man, plus like said before, its new and not really proven like tsp cams. my buddie has a
v2 cam only car and makes 400rwhp. its a nice cam! did you check out there 228r or there 233/239?
Old 03-07-2009, 08:55 PM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (49)
 
HavATampa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Which cam did you end up deciding on Synister?
Old 03-08-2009, 12:27 AM
  #27  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
synisterC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i havent bought one yet, i have been putting all my money so far into the head work. i think the v.2 will work nicely, i have yet to pm texas speed about this decision.sorry guys this is research i should be doing but i havent got around to it yet, if anyone has tried this yet let me know how it worked. i'm most concerned about ordering a cam that the manufacturer says will work but is not 100% sure. of course i will check ptv clearance before i button her up, however i dont want to buy a cam that might work just to find out that it doesnt, know what i mean?
Old 03-08-2009, 05:51 PM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
black01_WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Myers, FL.
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if your car see mostly the street then get the TV2. I have had mine before they even called it the TV2. It is tried and proven cam, and with a little bit of head work you will love it.

I was cam only for 2 years then put the heads on and the TQ down low makes it MUCH better to drive around town. The car is fun to drive and sounds good.



Quick Reply: polluter or torquer v.2, with 5.3 heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.