Looking for studies of engine oil additives?
*Lucas, Prolong, Slick 50 etc.
Last edited by RADONE; May 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM.
I use products like the Lucas Oil Stabilizer for engine assembly, but its not needed for regular oil changes.
You'll also see products like "Z-Max" for sale at stores, do not buy these. The government currently has a lawsuit against Z-max for selling products that don't work as advertised. In independent tests, the Z-max actually caused more engine wear than regular oil. I believe they concluded it was nothing more than mineral oil with some additives.
This is how it's been explained to me. Most oil manufactures start with a base oil, and most base oils are the same. They then add their additive package to make it their "blend".
Now they can make oil that's increases fuel mileage, but it will suffer elsewhere, maybe it will cause more wear.
Or they could make oil that's great in the wear department, but it's doesn't get great fuel mileage
It's all a balancing act, making an oil that does the above and performs well all around, and making it AFFORDABLE to the general public.
Kinda a quick explaination, hth
You can also go to www.atsm.org and look around, they set the standards for oil manufactures
So many people swear by these additives. They may improve performance by reducing friction, but unfortunately, I believe they all cause some form of long term damage.
I would like to review articles published by the SAE or similar group, reports filed by the FTC when taking action against the false claims of one of these companies, or research performed by an auto manufacturer to support denial of warranty in court when evidence that a additive damaged an engine. One of the oil gurus here must have a link or something.
Thanks



