6.0 liter heads
#1
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes the later heads are aluminum. They are typically a 70-71 cc combustion chamber and the intake and exhaust ports are identical to the LS6. I would suspect they would drop compression by a good .5-.-6.
They are great for a superchargered or NOS motor where you can use the head flow and lower compression.
They are great for a superchargered or NOS motor where you can use the head flow and lower compression.
#4
TECH Addict
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by smokinHawk:
<strong> They flow great 210cc intake 75cc exhaust same as ls6. Resoponds well to porting also.
I got them and think their worth it.
gm high perforance this month has an article about the ls heads. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I measured lS6 intake port stock and it was 215cc. Some on here claim there is differences in port design also between 6.0 and LS6. I have yet to mess with 6.0 heads, so i cant back that.
<strong> They flow great 210cc intake 75cc exhaust same as ls6. Resoponds well to porting also.
I got them and think their worth it.
gm high perforance this month has an article about the ls heads. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I measured lS6 intake port stock and it was 215cc. Some on here claim there is differences in port design also between 6.0 and LS6. I have yet to mess with 6.0 heads, so i cant back that.