Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Valve spring pressures?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2010, 07:34 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
468CH3V3LL3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Valve spring pressures?

I have AFR 205's, and when i was at the engine shop that put together my bottom end, they recommended that they test the spring pressures. The #8017 springs advertised at #135@1.800 and #340@1.230. We measured #150@1.785 and #390@1.185! This seemed odd to me!? Now i was told by the shop that these are too stiff and would cause lifters to blead down and cause ticking in the valve train and possibly more issues.

Then i called AFR was told that those pressures are fine with hyd. lifters. I just want the optimal springs for my setup. So basically regardless of weather the pressures were measured correctly or not, are those numbers acceptable for hyd. lifters? Do you have recommendations for different springs that will be better for my setup? Thanks in advance for your help!
Old 01-21-2010, 09:41 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
nitrousjunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My springs are 150 on the seat and 400 open. I drive the car about every other day with the stock 95000 mile lifters. I have had no problems.
Old 01-22-2010, 04:42 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The 8017 springs have a stiffness of 360 lb/in per the AFR web site. The 8019 springs have a stiffness of 428 lb/in. Since springs will get weaker with use lets look at your values.

(390-150)/(1.785-1.185) = 400 lb/in

Looks to me that you don't have 8017 springs but rather 8019 springs. These are excellent springs and a lot of guys run these springs (including me) without issues on a hydraulic lifter. I am now running Morels though, which will handle much higher valve spring forces.
Old 01-22-2010, 03:25 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
468CH3V3LL3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can guarentee that the springs i have are thoe #8017's because we measured the OD which measured 1.290. Do you think that new ls7 lifters could handle these pressures? Im just confused because im getting mixed opinions about what to do so any more input would be greatly appreciated!
Old 01-22-2010, 03:52 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
printmanjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You might look at it another way. How much spring pressure are the LS7 factory springs?I'm sure GM wouldn't put more pressure on the LS7 lifter than they can handle.
Old 01-22-2010, 05:42 PM
  #6  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The 8017 and 8019 spring look identical from the outside and will measure the same size physically. It sounds like you might have the 8019's but they could still be 8017s since they are shimmed to 1.785. The pressure increses as you shim the spring. Either way, you will be fine with hydraulic lifters. I run MUCH more spring pressure than that in some applications with no issues whatsoever. I never order the 8017's anymore because with most cams used these days, the 8019's are a much better choice.

Shane




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.