maximizing the area under the curve
Basically ask around for cam recommendations for stock heads that don't require reprogramming. (you'll want reprogramming to maximize the benefit, but by putting that caveat on you won't get aggressive cam recommendations that will hurt lower-end tq very much).
Basically staying fairly close to the stock grind but adding lift is what you'll want if you don't want the lower-end tq to suffer. keeping a wide LSA will help keep the tq band fairly flat. Take a look at the MTI Stealth cam.
gear
tire size
vehicle weight
max useable RPM
trans seletion,
et goal,
mph goal.
you need to know all of these. each variable can make or break a combo, start by getting a baseline at the track, and go from there.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The comparison can be found here:
www.afbforums.com/area
The C1 cam is what I have in my car right now. What I was trying to do is provide a way to compare the increases in going from one cam to another. Comparing peak HP/TQ numbers is not a good comparison for how a cam will compare real world, area under the curve seems to be that. So by looking at the comparison you can use it to help you make a decision on a cam. For example an LS6 cam and springs can be purchased more cheaply than a C1 cam and its appropriate springs. Does the difference in the 2, based on area under the curve, make it worthwhile to upgrade? That is the idea behind the comparison.
I chose the C1 cam over a year ago, before the G5X2 was available. Plus, the C1 has less lift, therefore it is easier on springs and my car is my daily driver.
Also, I take it that your graphs pertain to those cams being used with stock LS1 heads. Am this correct?
Thanks!
ramp rate means the aggressiveness of the lobes; most cames use XE or XE-R lobes. the later be the more aggressive. you can compare ramp rates by looking at the duration @.006 i believe. FWIW i down graded from a tr230 to an mti T1 for a more streetable setup and more low end tq.
ps. You would really be happy with the results if you'll add matching heads to the equation rather than just swapping the cam with stock heads.
Also, I take it that your graphs pertain to those cams being used with stock LS1 heads. Am this correct?
Thanks!
Yes the graphs are all with stock heads. And if I do get a new cam I may go even bigger than the G5X2.
I come from a circle track background. So the harder it lopes the more it is music to my ears... If the funds were available I would go the 427 root as you have.


