Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.185

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
bp944's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 245
Likes: 1
Default 3.185

Is anyone running a 3.185 stroke crank or any de-stroked crank? Could I you tell me your setup and the numbers that you're pulling. I'm looking at running a road racer and this seems to be the right choice.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 02:57 AM
  #2  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

Why does this seem to be the right choice?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 03:10 AM
  #3  
Brief Encounter's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Indiana (Highland)
Default

Because IIRC that is the stroke of the ALMS C6R's.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 03:35 AM
  #4  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

The only application where destroking an engine is applicable is in class racing that restricts cubic inches. Other than that it is an unnecessary waste of money.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 07:07 AM
  #5  
bww3588's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,139
Likes: 10
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Beaflag VonRathburg
The only application where destroking an engine is applicable is in class racing that restricts cubic inches. Other than that it is an unnecessary waste of money.
how? a high revving engine that lives up top (way up top) is perfect for road racing. why do you think the chevy 302 did so well? also, from the sound of it, he is racing in a CID restricted class of 305 simply because the 3.898 bore and a 3.185 stroke is just under 305 cubes.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 07:36 AM
  #6  
427's Avatar
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 6
From: Clayton, North Carolina
Default

Unless your rules require the engine be under a certain limit I would build a bigger engine. The 3.185 was required by rules for Daytona Prototype in the early days, they would produce around 490-510 in legal trim which had a 6500rpm limit and valve lift limits.

Kurt
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
pwrtrip75's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 9
From: Janesville, WI
Default

Awsome thread.... more opinions than answers.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #8  
02*C5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 303
From: Az
Default

Originally Posted by pwrtrip75
Awsome thread.... more opinions than answers.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #9  
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,146
Likes: 3
From: Jax Beach, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 427
unless your rules require the engine be under a certain limit i would build a bigger engine. The 3.185 was required by rules for daytona prototype in the early days, they would produce around 490-510 in legal trim which had a 6500rpm limit and valve lift limits.

Kurt
[/end thread]
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.