Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

help with getting pushrod size (VIDS)

Old Jun 26, 2011 | 06:41 PM
  #41  
Darkman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 6
From: Spring, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
According to my calculations, that's 0.071". You can confirm during installation if you have a dial indicator.
So you use 0.057 inch per turn rather than the 0.047 inch per turn, or is there some other difference?

Supplement Edit - Is this the answer?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/8261027-post11.html

Last edited by Darkman; Jun 26, 2011 at 06:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 04:21 AM
  #42  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

That's part of the answer. I spent some time last year using Shane's method, a dial indicator measurement, calculations and my adjustable pushrod measurements when I did a pushrod change in my car. I found that all three come out close to each other but there are a few nuances. When you tighten the rocker bolt to zero lash and then torque to 22 lb-ft, I found that it takes 1/3 turn after the rocker bottoms in the stand to reach final torque. The rockers were pretty consistent with this 1/3 turn. Once the rocker bottoms in the rocker stand, there is no more preload applied to the lifter. So if you use 1 turn for zero lash to full torque, only 2/3 turn are actually applying preload (bringing the rocker down to seat in the stand). For that case I get the following:

2/3 X 1.25/25.4 X 2.7/1.7 = 0.52 (Shane gets around 0.049" for this case so they match pretty well)

When the number of turns increases to 1-1/4, you still need to subtract the 1/3 bolt turn after the rocker seats in the stand.

(1.25-0.3333) X 1.25/25.4 X 2.7/1.7 = 0.071

Note that all of these are approximate but given the pushrods are available only in increments of 0.025" any of the methods should work. What Shane recommends is using turns to figure preload and if a pushrod is the wrong length try a different length to obtain the correct range of turns on the bolt. The math allows you to estimate the new length if you don't have different lengths available and provides another tool to work with and double check your work. One other tool that a lot of guys overlook is they usually have the stock pushrods available that will provide an estimate of length when counting turns using Shane's method, but the stock length is 7.385" and not 7.400" (I and others have measured similar length of the stock pushrods) as is the internet myth.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 05:59 AM
  #43  
Darkman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 6
From: Spring, Texas
Default

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you, sir.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 08:41 AM
  #44  
408Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,CA
Default

Wow very detailed and obviously spent a lot of time doing the comparing of methods. Appears ill be using 7.375 thanks guys
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 09:42 PM
  #45  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Not sure I follow what effect the lift has on a measurement at zero lash unless you are saying that the larger lift could require changes to the rocker stand which would then alter the pushrod length.
I'm actually a little suprised that you don't know why this is true. Think about this, in order to increase the lift of a given camshaft core size, the BASE CIRCLE MUST BECOME SMALLER. If you were to try and increase lift based on the actual distance from the centerline of the camshaft to the "top" of the lobe, the lobes would become "taller" than the camshaft bearing journals and the camshaft could not be physically inserted into the engine. Normally the highest point of the lobe is left constant with the base circle being made smaller. I thought this was common knowlege. I guess that is why I'm having such a hard time explaining these concepts here. If anyone is good with CAD maybe they could visually explain this.

Anyway, since the base circle determines the distance from the pushrod cup to the lifter... as lift increases, the pushrod will need to be longer to make up the difference.

Shane
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 04:54 AM
  #46  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS
I'm actually a little suprised that you don't know why this is true. Think about this, in order to increase the lift of a given camshaft core size, the BASE CIRCLE MUST BECOME SMALLER. If you were to try and increase lift based on the actual distance from the centerline of the camshaft to the "top" of the lobe, the lobes would become "taller" than the camshaft bearing journals and the camshaft could not be physically inserted into the engine. Normally the highest point of the lobe is left constant with the base circle being made smaller. I thought this was common knowlege. I guess that is why I'm having such a hard time explaining these concepts here. If anyone is good with CAD maybe they could visually explain this.

Anyway, since the base circle determines the distance from the pushrod cup to the lifter... as lift increases, the pushrod will need to be longer to make up the difference.

Shane

No, I understand that. Your prior statement was "...I have no idea how anyone is getting less than a 7.400" pushrod with a .600"+ lift cam in an otherwise stock combo."

The way I interpreted your statement was that a cam under 0.600" lift fell into another category then one over 0.600" and that was the point of confusion, at least for me.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 11:06 AM
  #47  
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 4
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Default

Sorry, what I meant was .600" lift seems to be the break point between 7.400" and 7.425" pushrods for ideal preload.

Shane
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2011 | 02:57 PM
  #48  
408Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,CA
Default

Thanks to both of you and darkman for posting and helping out. All know what your talking about and put the time into figuring everything out. With what was said it looks like I could have really went with either the 7.375 or 7.400 so went with the shorter as it looked to get the preload right.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 12:20 PM
  #49  
408Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,CA
Default

Ok so got her all done and started right up but sounds like a damn sewing machine bad. And got a lil scared think I heard a lifter ticking a bit off and on for a min. So guess need to go 7.4 and see what happens
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 12:31 PM
  #50  
Darkman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 6
From: Spring, Texas
Default

Did you bring it up to operating temperature? I only ask because there can be a lot of racket on the first start until enough oil gets to and through the top of the engine and the lifters get pumped up.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 01:39 PM
  #51  
408Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,CA
Default

Yea about 10-15 min and was at 210
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 06:32 PM
  #52  
408Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,CA
Default

Put the 7.4 in but still got noise. Overall hard to really hear it since I have to get the exhaust welded up and my camcorder on my phone sucks!!
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 06:52 PM
  #53  
hiltsy855's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 28
From: Iowa
Default

Did the 7.4s make it better (less noise)? I think it would since Patrick G says .080-.100 preload is best. Give it a little time it might improve.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 06:58 PM
  #54  
408Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,CA
Default

Hard to tell honestly but think a lil bit
Reply
Old May 20, 2012 | 10:46 PM
  #55  
badazz81z28's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Its hard to tell from the video but one observation, the 10 turns looks like you are forcing it a bit and in the process pushing down with some force on the pushrod/lifter, which will give a bit. Be very very gentle when you move the tip up and down so no force is transferred through the rocker to the pushrod (like you are lifting the tip with a feather).

Looks to me like either 9.5 or 9.75 is in the ball park based on the videos on page 1.

One other note, if you need to alter the wipe by shimming or reducing the rocker height, this will also change the pushrod length. So if you plan to alter the wipe pattern at all do that first then measure.


I brought this thread back from the dead.

Vettenuts, your post kind of confuses me a bit. You say 9.5 to 9.75 is in the ball park, but the rockers still rattle up and down. Do you consider that zero lash?

9.75 jiggles up and down, so isnt 10 turns ideal for zero lash?
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 12:46 AM
  #56  
89ROC-Z's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Default

I don't see why people are so confused. I just did this tonight. I'm used to setting valve lash on flat tappets so i turned the checker out 10 turns, torqued the stand down, and measured how much lash there was with a feeler gauge.

10 turns = 0.500, length of checker = 6.800, used 2 0.025 feeler gauges to get zero lash. SO 0.500 + 6.800 + 0.050 feeler gauge equals a 7.350" fushrod for ZERO lash. Add in whatever preload you want:

.050 = 7.4"
.060 = 7.41
.070 = 7.42"
.075 = 7.425"
.080 = 4.43"

I'm going to order 7.400" and call it a day

EDIT: wait a second now i think i f'ed myself...didn't take into account the ration on the rocker. i'll think about it more at work tomorrow lol
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 01:44 AM
  #57  
ZeeOSix's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by 89ROC-Z
EDIT: wait a second now i think i f'ed myself...didn't take into account the ration on the rocker. i'll think about it more at work tomorrow lol
Not sure what you mean by that. Seems you did it right. Find the pushrod length that gives you zero lash with the rocker arm bolt torqued to 22 ft-lbs, and add what ever lifter pre-load you're after.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #58  
badazz81z28's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
Not sure what you mean by that. Seems you did it right. Find the pushrod length that gives you zero lash with the rocker arm bolt torqued to 22 ft-lbs, and add what ever lifter pre-load you're after.
My confusion come from what I thought was zero lash (no movement). but vettenuts is saying that clicky video with 9.5-9.75 turns in zero lash
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #59  
ZeeOSix's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 452
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
My confusion come from what I thought was zero lash (no movement). but vettenuts is saying that clicky video with 9.5-9.75 turns in zero lash
Zero lash is when all up/down pushrod movement is gone. You should hear a little clicking and feel it too, then a bit more length on the pushrod would make that all that disappear ... that's the point of zero lash.
Reply
Old May 21, 2012 | 07:55 PM
  #60  
badazz81z28's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
Zero lash is when all up/down pushrod movement is gone. You should hear a little clicking and feel it too, then a bit more length on the pushrod would make that all that disappear ... that's the point of zero lash.
Thats what I have been doing. For example, there is a very good click..click...click at 9.75 turns. 10 turns and really nothing. So zero lash is about 10 turns.

That video shows a rocker way loose and was told thats zero lash.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE