Which cam for a 3500 stall?
03-06-2004, 05:42 PM
#1
Which cam for a 3500 stall? I did some searching already too....
I have a MW 3500 (yet to be installed) and 3.73s. I dont have the $$ for headers yet.
I am in the process of taking out a cam and I was wondering what a good choice would be for a replacement. Would a TR224 run and idle good w/o a tune, having the 3500 stall in there? How about the TR220 or a Lunati with the old B1 specs?
Also, I think I want to go with a 114 lsa, but would a 112 be all that bad?
I want headers, but the car is apart now and I dont want to take it apart a third time down the road for a cam swap. Once the cam is in, I can do headers w/o much work anytime down the road...definately easier than doing a cam again.
Opinions?
I have a MW 3500 (yet to be installed) and 3.73s. I dont have the $$ for headers yet.
I am in the process of taking out a cam and I was wondering what a good choice would be for a replacement. Would a TR224 run and idle good w/o a tune, having the 3500 stall in there? How about the TR220 or a Lunati with the old B1 specs?
Also, I think I want to go with a 114 lsa, but would a 112 be all that bad?
I want headers, but the car is apart now and I dont want to take it apart a third time down the road for a cam swap. Once the cam is in, I can do headers w/o much work anytime down the road...definately easier than doing a cam again.
Opinions?
03-06-2004, 06:18 PM
#2
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well the no doubt the 220 cam runs good with out a tune I had the tr224/112 in my a4 with out a convertor and it ran pretty good for no tune but it would run good with a convetor. If you want your car to have the real cam sounding car get a 112 but it will be a lot smoother if you get a 114.
