Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1.85 rockers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 06:27 PM
  #1  
HioSSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default 1.85 rockers?

How will they work on a 6.0 in a 2500 hd. Truck just has a few bolt-ons, lookin for a little more across tq across the board. Will I need to change valve springs? Has anyone done this swap?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #2  
DMM's Avatar
DMM
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Default

Yes you would need valve springs, and that would not be your answer to getting torque. Bite the bullet and get a decent torque cam (it WILL make power everywhere, not just down low) and keep it mid .550's and you can use off the shelf Z06 "yellow" springs on the cheap.

I used the Comp 265 low lift in my '03 ECSB 4x4 5.3 (212/218 .522"/.529" on 114*) and it has tons of torque and plenty of power up top also. The problem with the truck motors is that they have almost NO timing...my stock tables had only 1* @ 2000 RPM maxing out at 11* @ 6k.

If you have the itch for more power and don't want to do a cam yet, get you timing tables done correctly and maybe add some L/T headers before the tune if you want an easy kick without going in the motor.

Put the screen back in your MAF, that is hurting you esp. at low speeds (torque) where the velocity/volume of air flowing across the sensor needs to be broken up to be read properly.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2011 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

Change the cam profile and not the rockers.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2011 | 05:17 PM
  #4  
HioSSilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 644
From: Winchester, VA
Default

I just thought it would be a easy/minor upgrade for my truck. I did a search but did'nt really find any results. I have SS silverado timing tables in it now. I don't want exhaust because I pull to much with it and don't want to hear the noise.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2011 | 05:38 PM
  #5  
JPH's Avatar
JPH
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Default

It is easier, but BEST bang for your buck and benefit is thru a new cam profile.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2011 | 05:59 PM
  #6  
blk/slvr02ss's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 1
From: Port Saint Lucie,Florida
Default

U could do some shortie headers for more torque w/ out the noise and even full lenght headers w/ a stock muffler and cats wont b noisey!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2011 | 11:50 PM
  #7  
DMM's Avatar
DMM
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I just thought it would be a easy/minor upgrade for my truck. I did a search but did'nt really find any results. I have SS silverado timing tables in it now. I don't want exhaust because I pull to much with it and don't want to hear the noise.
I took a quick look through the tune repository but did not find a stock SS tune, I would venture to guess that it is still on the very conservative side though. Post your tune if you have it, I am pretty sure that you can still get a little bit better no matter what stock tables you are running.

If you get headers with the cats (OBX for example), that is where the power is and the exhaust tone will be a little more "raspy" without being loud or changing the tone, if that makes sense. You can keep the OE exhaust with the headers, not much power to be had there anyhow. There are a lot of threads where shorties were tested and gained almost nothing over stock manifolds, so I would save that headache.

It definitely looks like you are looking for a performance change that only a new cam can provide you, which is easy enough believe it or not. You need to further define what it is that you are looking for (stump puller torque, more mid range when towing, emissions compatibility, etc) so that you can get shopping. I would stay mid .550's lift though for a long running reliable setup that you will not have to worry about springs. A lot of people are spec-ing .600+ lift cams for trucks now, and I just don't think the small power increase is worth it in a truck to be honest.

5.3 and 6.0 truck cams are pretty easy and there are lots of threads on them, I would use Google to start.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 PM.