Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

400hp NA 4.8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2012, 10:42 AM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cirvin33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark21742
In the stickies st the top of the gen3 internal engine section I think there is a list of all the specs for each engine
O ok. Thanks man.
Old 02-28-2012, 11:49 AM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Your best option is a 6.0 swap. Gonna need hi compression, aggressive cam and all bolt ons plus good tune.
Now if go 6.0 can make 400+ thru stock manifolds and a CheaTR cam or similar. Thru stock intake manifold and tb. With a good cai and tune.
Oe like idle and drivability.
Old 02-28-2012, 11:53 AM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I prefer the 4.8s for turbo motors. I always have. Even before the hot rod mag 1000hp 4.8.
The 4l60e in my stock 4.8 rcsb has 335k miles. I tow cars and haul up to 3 ls engines at a time. Shifts and runs like new. But I have large oil cooler I installed long time ago and deeper pan
Old 02-28-2012, 02:10 PM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cirvin33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
I prefer the 4.8s for turbo motors. I always have. Even before the hot rod mag 1000hp 4.8.
The 4l60e in my stock 4.8 rcsb has 335k miles. I tow cars and haul up to 3 ls engines at a time. Shifts and runs like new. But I have large oil cooler I installed long time ago and deeper pan
I haven't really heard much bad about the 4l60e either in a stock truck.

Ok so IF I was going to do a 6.0 swap, all I would need is a long block right? Also, would the truck even be driveable before a tune? Or just not have near the power? Sorry for all of the questions. Just tryin to fig out best bang for the $.
Old 02-28-2012, 02:24 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 2,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Install a wideband A/F gauge, it should fire up but you might have to play with the gas pedal.....as long as the air/fuel ratio stays safe you could drive it, but get it tuned ASAP no matter what
Old 02-28-2012, 02:42 PM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

To everyone saying it's going to be hard to hit 400 with a 4.8...go tell that to the 5.0 mustang guys doing it with worse heads and only 10 more cubes.
Uhh, you can't compare a DOHC high revving motor to a 2v pushrod one.

Also, the coyote heads are vastly superior to anything LS 2v related, short of the LS7s. Idk where you got the idea that the 5.0 has worse heads than a 4.8 LS...
Old 02-28-2012, 04:16 PM
  #27  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cirvin33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark21742
Install a wideband A/F gauge, it should fire up but you might have to play with the gas pedal.....as long as the air/fuel ratio stays safe you could drive it, but get it tuned ASAP no matter what
Ok. Well I think I have enough info now to start doin some research and fig out what I think will be my best option. Thanks again for everyone's input.
Old 02-29-2012, 12:35 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
93Z2871805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
To everyone saying it's going to be hard to hit 400 with a 4.8...go tell that to the 5.0 mustang guys doing it with worse heads and only 10 more cubes.

Originally Posted by redtan
Uhh, you can't compare a DOHC high revving motor to a 2v pushrod one.

Also, the coyote heads are vastly superior to anything LS 2v related, short of the LS7s. Idk where you got the idea that the 5.0 has worse heads than a 4.8 LS...
I don't think he was talking about the Coyote (like you said, they are monstrous and flow something like 350 cfm). I believe he was talking about stuff like the popular GT-40 heads that flow around 200 cfm for the Windsor based 302s.

Last edited by 93Z2871805; 02-29-2012 at 12:44 AM.
Old 02-29-2012, 02:02 AM
  #29  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Yes. Definitely not the coyote. I know they are killer engines.

I was talking about the old stuff. Like when a set of ported ls heads can out flow some of the best 5.0 aftermarket stuff.
Old 02-29-2012, 02:03 AM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

400 hp to the tires is a pretty extreme 5.0 SBF
Old 02-29-2012, 02:37 AM
  #31  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I'm talking about to the crank. I believe the op is too.
Old 02-29-2012, 06:34 AM
  #32  
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (11)
 
custm2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RWHP is not at the crank

Ford sucks and they are slow. 500 hp from a 302 is not going to happen without a ton of money(the old style).

The 4.8 is a great engine but unless you are trying to prove a point the only way to make them scream is boost. N/A you can turn some heads and make a decent runner but swap to a 6.0 and you are 10 mods ahead in stock form.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:22 AM
  #33  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Nobody is talking about power at the wheels...And he already said he is not swapping and not going with boost. Bottom line is, 400 at the crank is very possible. That's what he wants. Not boost and not a 6.0
Old 02-29-2012, 07:25 AM
  #34  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Best bang for the buck would be to follow along the lines you already have laid out.

Whatever you do to the 4.8 can transfer over to the 6.0 with the exception of the cam. It will but you would probably want bigger in The 6.0

Do heads and cam to the 4.8 so you don't have to mess with the swap and if you get bored with it later on...then look at a swap.
Old 02-29-2012, 07:49 AM
  #35  
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (11)
 
custm2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I apologize I thought the OP was talking about RWHP, I looked and was wrong.

Obviously that makes it much easier but it will still be difficult. Close but I doubt he will brake 400 at the crank.

I was not particularly trying to talk him into a swap or boost, I was making the point that you can mod the 4.8 and make a decent runner. But without serious money and time along with a little bit of luck you will be 350-375 hp at the crank, and should run low 13s maybe high 12s.

That is certainly respectable but looses some clout when you have a mile long list of mods to get there. You should be happy with the result and just hope you don't want more down the road because the most expensive things you put on a 4.8 won't swap to a 6.0. Most heads won't work with the larger boar and cam will be too small in most any case.( I am lmost certain on thise, if someone could verify that would be great)

Good luck on your build and hopefully you go a head with it. So many times we all spend time debating these topics for the person in question to end up driving a stock truck anyhow.



Quick Reply: 400hp NA 4.8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.