Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3 mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2014, 09:13 AM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
2muchboostNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure if you read this article but its a good one. I was interested in swapping in an LS6 cam in my 05 LM7 till I read it.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...n/viewall.html
Old 09-05-2014, 09:54 PM
  #22  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
454ragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Carver, MA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2muchboostNY
Not sure if you read this article but its a good one. I was interested in swapping in an LS6 cam in my 05 LM7 till I read it.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...n/viewall.html
I so looked forward to that article, but was extremely disappointed to find they didn't test the later LS6 cam, with the higher lift. Think that's the one everyone looks for.
Jim
Old 09-05-2014, 10:47 PM
  #23  
Launching!
 
leftlanetruckin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mid Mo via Lancs. England
Posts: 276
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a LM7 in a Range Rover. I went with the LS6 intake for height reasons, but it can work.
I ended up with a water pump from an Escalade IIRC, and it works perfectly with no "massaging".
Everything else bolted up as the truck intake did.
5.3 mods-ls6-intake-wiring-web.jpg

Martin
Old 09-09-2014, 09:02 AM
  #24  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
2muchboostNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@454....that would make sense. Yeah based on that article the LS6 which they tested was disappointing.



Quick Reply: 5.3 mods



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.