Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stroker options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2013, 11:46 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
 
ls1 1990 VN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auckland, Nth Is, New Zealand.
Posts: 1,371
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by conan
The 'MAX' bore of the ls1 (3.905) is the limiting factor for that block vs the lq9/4
Originally Posted by conan
^^^

My apologies for not listing every size a ls1 block has every been honed out too... Most stop at 3.905
Only quoting what you said matey.

Last edited by ls1 1990 VN; 11-01-2013 at 09:09 PM.
Old 11-01-2013, 01:18 PM
  #22  
Launching!
 
BWZ_2k2Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It sounds like you're about to spend alot of money on something that is gonna be fun for a LITTLE WHILE. Then you're gonna wish you went bigger with all the money you spent.

To each its own...
Old 11-01-2013, 03:02 PM
  #23  
Launching!
 
Cra-Z Larry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Honey Brook, Pa.
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want to use a 4.8 then find that article that Hot Rod(I think) did on twin turbos on a 4.8. They thought they had a 5.3 but ended up being a 4.8, put out 1200hp on an engine dyno and that was with a stock bottom end out of a junk yard. Just food for thought!!
Old 11-01-2013, 03:24 PM
  #24  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Dumbest. Thread. Ever.
I agree, I have no idea what the kid is saying. Like he's talking to himself really.
Old 11-01-2013, 04:36 PM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (21)
 
Bilster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The easiest destroking combo is the 4.8 crank AND rods with LS1/LS6 pistons....all factory parts or off shelf replacement aftermarket parts. So the 4.8 or 5.3 is bored to the 3.905" size (max bore) or if you are starting with a LS1, it will also be bored to 3.905" (max bore). The reason for the max bore is not only getting some cubic inches but to unshroud the valve as much as this combination allows for maximum flow. This combo is possible because the 4.8 piston shares the same compression height as an LS1...or even a 5.3, for that matter. This motor will be about 314 cubic inches. I bet it would make a hell of a boosted motor because long rod/short stroke combinations usually respond well to boost and are very durable.
Old 11-01-2013, 09:18 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
 
ls1 1990 VN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auckland, Nth Is, New Zealand.
Posts: 1,371
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bilster
The easiest destroking combo is the 4.8 crank AND rods with LS1/LS6 pistons....all factory parts or off shelf replacement aftermarket parts. So the 4.8 or 5.3 is bored to the 3.905" size (max bore) or if you are starting with a LS1, it will also be bored to 3.905" (max bore). The reason for the max bore is not only getting some cubic inches but to unshroud the valve as much as this combination allows for maximum flow. This combo is possible because the 4.8 piston shares the same compression height as an LS1...or even a 5.3, for that matter. This motor will be about 314 cubic inches. I bet it would make a hell of a boosted motor because long rod/short stroke combinations usually respond well to boost and are very durable.
You a friend of conan!




LS1 LS2 LS6 3.908 Mahle Pistons

Bore:3.908
Stroke: 3.622
Rod Length: 6.098
Dome Volume: -4
Pin Diameter .945
Compression Height: 1.340
Click here to check inventory on Piston Kit LS1340908F04

Bore:3.908
Stroke: 3.622
Rod Length: 6.125
Dome Volume: -4
Pin Diameter .927
Compression Height: 1.314
Click here to check inventory on Piston Kit LS1314908F04

Bore:3.908
Stroke: 3.622
Rod Length: 6.125
Dome Volume: -9
Pin Diameter .927
Compression Height: 1.314
Click here to check inventory on Piston Kit LS1314908I09

Bore:3.908
Stroke: 3.622
Rod Length: 6.125
Dome Volume: -16
Pin Diameter .927
Compression Height: 1.314
Click here to check inventory on Piston Kit LS1314908I16

Bore:3.908
Stroke: 4.000
Rod Length: 6.125
Dome Volume: -6
Pin Diameter .927
Compression Height: 1.105R
Click here to check inventory on Piston Kit LS1105908I06
Old 11-02-2013, 02:52 AM
  #27  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Kemmerer29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bilster
The easiest destroking combo is the 4.8 crank AND rods with LS1/LS6 pistons....all factory parts or off shelf replacement aftermarket parts. So the 4.8 or 5.3 is bored to the 3.905" size (max bore) or if you are starting with a LS1, it will also be bored to 3.905" (max bore). The reason for the max bore is not only getting some cubic inches but to unshroud the valve as much as this combination allows for maximum flow. This combo is possible because the 4.8 piston shares the same compression height as an LS1...or even a 5.3, for that matter. This motor will be about 314 cubic inches. I bet it would make a hell of a boosted motor because long rod/short stroke combinations usually respond well to boost and are very durable.
Thanks much for this info
That's exactly what I wanted to hear
I'll keep you posted as to how everything goes
Old 11-02-2013, 02:54 AM
  #28  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Kemmerer29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redtan

I agree, I have no idea what the kid is saying. Like he's talking to himself really.
And I found out what I wanted to know
So does it really matter what all I said cause in the end I got what I wanted out of this thread.
Smart a**!!!
Old 11-02-2013, 03:48 AM
  #29  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
handyandy496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: florida
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

There's NO substitute for cubic inches.
Old 11-02-2013, 07:05 AM
  #30  
Launching!
 
BWZ_2k2Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by handyandy496
There's NO substitute for cubic inches.


I think I get what he wants to do and thats fine and all. He wants to go out and beat some mustangs with similar displacement and shoot down their argument of "Your engine is bigger"? I can see how that could be somewhat satisfying. But I think once he beats a couple of them he's gonna wish he spent the same money for a bigger build to beat all/most the mustangs he runs into.
Old 11-02-2013, 09:36 AM
  #31  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Kemmerer29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BWZ_2k2Z28


I think I get what he wants to do and thats fine and all. He wants to go out and beat some mustangs with similar displacement and shoot down their argument of "Your engine is bigger"? I can see how that could be somewhat satisfying. But I think once he beats a couple of them he's gonna wish he spent the same money for a bigger build to beat all/most the mustangs he runs into.
Pretty much nailed it
However I have never ruled out forced induction
Just not something I'm gonna do on a yard motor
I'm gonna find a short block and go from there
And I also wanna see if its possible to de stroke a newer technology small block and build something similar to the 302 Chevy from
Back in the day
Old 11-02-2013, 10:30 AM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kemmerer29

So my question is yes can I de stroke a 5.3 buy putting in a 4.8 crank then going to town on heads and cam and all that good stuff
the 4.8 is already a de-stroked 5.3. they have the same bore.
Old 11-02-2013, 10:46 AM
  #33  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Kemmerer29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RezinTexas

the 4.8 is already a de-stroked 5.3. they have the same bore.
So did a 327 and 283 and they no problem
Doing that now did they
Old 11-02-2013, 10:56 AM
  #34  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
handyandy496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: florida
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Go big or don't go!
Old 11-02-2013, 11:21 AM
  #35  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Kemmerer29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kemmerer29

So did a 327 and 283 and they no problem
Doing that now did they
283 and 307 have the same bore 3.875
My bad
I apologize I've been in the Jap/Euro world for a few years and haven't thought of doing a v-8
But after finding out what It would take to make decent power out of a Bimmer I was like screw this I'm building a Trans Am

305-327- and 350 have the same bore
I totally spaced 327 having a 4" bore
But also I remember seeing something once a guy had I believe it was a 335 stroker of some sort in an Iroc I believe made from a 305
And I don't know what crank but I would assume the only other crank would be a 350 so how does that work
Same Bore
Old 11-02-2013, 12:13 PM
  #36  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

305 has a smaller bore, like the 4.8/5.3L engines. That's why no one like them:
Old 11-02-2013, 03:00 PM
  #37  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Kemmerer29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

305 were/are absolute junk.

And that's why know one likes them
They run like crap!!!

I think we can all agree in this
Old 11-02-2013, 05:31 PM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kemmerer29
So did a 327 and 283 and they no problem
Doing that now did they
my point was there is no reason to put a 4.8 crank in a 5.3. Just get a 4.8 motor.
Old 11-02-2013, 06:42 PM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

no need to spin a motor past peak hp .the ls heads flow a lot better then most old school engine heads .the ls head can make better power at a lower rpm with a smaller cam.cubes is king .a few ls1 have made 460 rwhp with stock ported heads and short block ,that is with a hd rear end. my old 509 bbc made 761 hp at 7000 rpm ,it ran fastest when shifting at 7000 rpm.
Old 11-03-2013, 12:22 AM
  #40  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

That's not true. Almost all LS1s with plastic manifolds peak in the 6300 range due to the runner design. Guess what? You go faster the higher you shift, especially if you can hold peak HP beyond 6300. Almost any cam bigger than a 224 can hold on to 6600-6700...


Quick Reply: Stroker options



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.