Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

.041" head gaskets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 02:47 AM
  #1  
RonSSNova's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 814
From: Portland, OR
Default .041" head gaskets

Trying to help a buddy prep a SBE 6.0 turbo setup.

He bought what he thought were Felpro .052" gaskets, but either Summit messed up, or he misunderstood, and ended up with the .041".

With the typical LS pistons .007 out of the hole this leaves us with a Quench of .034".

Too tight?

Ron
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 06:51 AM
  #2  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

I am running 0.040" Cometics as I think a lot of other guys are as well. Can't remember my out of the hole numbers, might have been a tad smaller but they were certainly above the surface. No problems here.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
redtan's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 17
From: Belmont, MA
Default

I've heard for a turbo quench is not as important and usually people go with around stock value with that. Unless you're on a time crunch, I would get the right parts.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 03:33 PM
  #4  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

I'm running .041" felpro MLS and very happy. Personally I feel throttle response was better vs the stock head gaskets
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 05:26 PM
  #5  
KW Baraka's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 132
From: S.A., TX
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
.........bought what he thought were Felpro......and ended up with the .041".

With the typical LS pistons .007 out of the hole this leaves us with a Quench of .034".

Too tight?
In a word.......no.

KW
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2015 | 07:43 PM
  #6  
RonSSNova's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 814
From: Portland, OR
Default

After a little research, I agree.
Added bonus is that when turbocharged, it won't need to run past 6500 rpm.
Being a dished piston engine, quench is prob less important. No flat on the piston.

We will go with them.

Thanks guys.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2015 | 08:58 AM
  #7  
.boB's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 897
Likes: 33
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Maybe. A tight quench will make the engine a bit more efficient, turbo and NA. A forced induction engine is less sensitive than NA, but it still matters. People who are building "low" rpm street engines will tighten the quench for more low end torque and efficiency. Helps prevent detonation at higher cylinder pressures, too.

the concern is that at high rpm's the rods and crank can stretch, and the quench gets smaller. If things stretch too much, the pistons will contact the heads.

If you're using stock rods and crank with some miles/abuse on them, you might be on the ragged edge. If you're using new quality forged parts, you're fine.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.