Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why do people complain about over 4 inch strokes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2018, 09:03 AM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by truckdoug
lol came in here expecting dirty joke, 01ssreda4 delivered
It was the first thing I thought of when I saw the title. Though, perhaps my mind is in the gutter. Oh well.
Old 08-17-2018, 09:27 PM
  #42  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,689
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

so i can't keep the crank and rods if i get new pistons? can a crank be rebalanced for the new pistons?
Old 08-17-2018, 09:45 PM
  #43  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,596
Received 3,679 Likes on 2,240 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
so i can't keep the crank and rods if i get new pistons? can a crank be rebalanced for the new pistons?
You can keep them. Rebalancing is not a problem. Kent was simply saying sometimes it’s easier to sell what you have as a combo, and buy new. Might even save you money, if you catch the new assembly on sale.
Old 08-17-2018, 11:45 PM
  #44  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,689
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle


You can keep them. Rebalancing is not a problem. Kent was simply saying sometimes it’s easier to sell what you have as a combo, and buy new. Might even save you money, if you catch the new assembly on sale.
black friday bitches lol.....but yea im goona wait until then and see.....i have to confirm what kind of assembly we have......highly leaning towards the 4.1.........will the 4.1 be an issue if i were to go LLSR 7500 rpm shifts?
Old 08-18-2018, 08:48 AM
  #45  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,596
Received 3,679 Likes on 2,240 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
black friday bitches lol.....but yea im goona wait until then and see.....i have to confirm what kind of assembly we have......highly leaning towards the 4.1.........will the 4.1 be an issue if i were to go LLSR 7500 rpm shifts?
As long as the setup is optimized for the rpm, you’ll be fine. LLSR requires better springs. For the camshaft you’ll need to turn that kind of rpm, you’ll likely need a shaft rocker setup. Depends on camshaft lift numbers. To get the girl to breathe up there, you’ll need a real good intake also. Do your homework, and it will work out.
Old 08-18-2018, 11:17 AM
  #46  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,689
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

So what I can do is reply later in a few months when it gets taken apart and report back with what is in there. Then decide the 4 or 4.1 option
Old 08-18-2018, 05:24 PM
  #47  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

LLSR will be fine. Like mentioned above beef up springs. Also, open up your pushrods bosses and run 3/8 rods. If you are using ls7 heads they already fit. Get manton series 5. Big help for stability. If your valvetrain is good and stable, rpm should not be an issue imo.

I have never built a 4.1 stroke motor but the GMPP lsx454 is a 4.1 stroke, so I imagine if built right is not a big deal
Old 08-18-2018, 08:05 PM
  #48  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Anything over a 4 inch crank is when you really have to start watching the length of the sleeves.
The LSX and the LS2 are both about 5.6, the LS7 is around 5.9 top to bttom on the thrust wall. I'm thinking the iron 6.0 is 5.5 or so. Too bad LS7 blocks are known for cracking cylinder walls.
Old 08-18-2018, 08:16 PM
  #49  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,596
Received 3,679 Likes on 2,240 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Anything over a 4 inch crank is when you really have to start watching the length of the sleeves.
The LSX and the LS2 are both about 5.6, the LS7 is around 5.9 top to bttom on the thrust wall. I'm thinking the iron 6.0 is 5.5 or so. Too bad LS7 blocks are known for cracking cylinder walls.
Tusky, he’s gonna sleeve a GM block, but you are absolutely correct.
Old 08-18-2018, 11:33 PM
  #50  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 170 Likes on 120 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Anything over a 4 inch crank is when you really have to start watching the length of the sleeves.
The LSX and the LS2 are both about 5.6, the LS7 is around 5.9 top to bttom on the thrust wall. I'm thinking the iron 6.0 is 5.5 or so. Too bad LS7 blocks are known for cracking cylinder walls.
lots of guys rev and spray Stock ls7 blocks
Old 08-18-2018, 11:35 PM
  #51  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 170 Likes on 120 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

But yeah it’s the iron 6.0 blocks that you need to be more careful with for adding stroke on Stock sleeves. They’re short
Old 08-19-2018, 12:12 AM
  #52  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,689
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle


Tusky, he’s gonna sleeve a GM block, but you are absolutely correct.
correction, i have a sleeved block......still havent gotten a chance to take a few pics, but when i popped the cover on the tub, i found the filler neck broke off the valve cover, and on that same cover the gasket was all hanging out like they just tightened it down without lining it up or something.........it is what it is
Old 08-19-2018, 12:21 AM
  #53  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Understood. Darton sleeved? A darton sleeve is 5.800". I've heard of guys going 4.250 inch stroke on those but not recommended for street use at all. Reason why? A shorter piston is used then. Shorter pistons means less rings on the piston. Not so street friendly.
Old 08-19-2018, 12:28 AM
  #54  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,689
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Whatever erl used......glad u mentioned the "smushed" piston, so i wont consider anything over 4.1 since durability is obviously a concern and dont wanna take chances anywhere on this build
Old 08-19-2018, 09:00 AM
  #55  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Understood. Darton sleeved? A darton sleeve is 5.800". I've heard of guys going 4.250 inch stroke on those but not recommended for street use at all. Reason why? A shorter piston is used then. Shorter pistons means less rings on the piston. Not so street friendly.
Not exactly, I still have 3 rings on the piston. I helieve Brian Tooley had a 4.250” stroke engine built a long time ago with a sleeved block and I believe there were still 3 rings on that piston design. On mine, instead of using 1.5/1.5/3.0mm like a lot of “basic” designs, I have 1.0/1.0/2.0mm rings like Mahle uses on their shelf pistons. That’s about .080” of real estate freed up for thicker ring lands and/or moving the skirt up higher. It’s still less than 1.00” of compression height, so no nitrous or boost. If I were to do it again, I would probably opt for a more wear resitant 4032 alloy instead of the softer 2618.
Old 08-19-2018, 09:23 AM
  #56  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 598 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

I hope to Erik awhile back about it. He have built alot of those 4.250 stroker motors. If I recall right he told he uses a custom 2 ring deal on his and the piston is shorter than a average 3 ring piston.... but that's been years ago.
Old 08-19-2018, 09:24 AM
  #57  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

KCS you continue to amaze with your deep knowledge.
Old 08-19-2018, 10:39 AM
  #58  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
I hope to Erik awhile back about it. He have built alot of those 4.250 stroker motors. If I recall right he told he uses a custom 2 ring deal on his and the piston is shorter than a average 3 ring piston.... but that's been years ago.
I know the one you're talking about, I think that was for James Day’s engine, race only application. He kept that on his desk when his shop was in Houston. Yeah, that was years ago and luckily piston tech has come a long way since then.

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
KCS you continue to amaze with your deep knowledge.
Gracias. I learned from really smart guys like Erik and others from when I went to the School of Automotive Machinists years ago. *shameless plug alert*
Old 08-19-2018, 11:09 AM
  #59  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,431
Received 3,230 Likes on 2,519 Posts
Default

Nothing wrong with plugging SAM; if you want to learn engines, THERE is where you go!
Old 08-19-2018, 11:28 AM
  #60  
TECH Resident
 
jhshnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

This is a great post for me because I’m torn between a 3.9” and a 4” crank for my ls1 block. It’s a llsr Mamo 220s and Mamo MSD build, and I want it to last a while, but after reading the article from K1 I’m not so sure if the smarter decision is to go with a 3.9” crank?

I’ll take any advice.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 AM.