Best oil to use?
Agreed except down here in Texas our viscosity recommendations are higher than in New York for example, and Australia is pretty close to the equator so it should be like Texas weather.
In other words, I would assume the recommendation for higher viscosity in Australia was due to high temps, rather than not needing to meet CAFE
Besides, since you obviously acknowledge the thinner oil will give better mpg, and mpg is a selling point, it wouldn't make much sense for them to run the higher viscosity and lose a couple of MPG points and potentially lose an edge on the competition.
But I've been wrong before, so I could be now too lol.
In other words, I would assume the recommendation for higher viscosity in Australia was due to high temps, rather than not needing to meet CAFE
Besides, since you obviously acknowledge the thinner oil will give better mpg, and mpg is a selling point, it wouldn't make much sense for them to run the higher viscosity and lose a couple of MPG points and potentially lose an edge on the competition.
But I've been wrong before, so I could be now too lol.
I thought Holden was being honest with its customers and not trying to meet MPG goals alone. It recommended the oil it felt was truly best for the motor and not a government reg. Its hot in the south and the southwest and yet the manufactures recommend light oils. In Ford's case, 5-20s. Surely, its not for the good of the motor. Its good to meet regs and works well enough to take the car beyond warranty.
I submit this as an opinion, and we all know about opinions. But, the fact remains that at least in my motor there is little difference in idle pressure between the oils. So for peace of mind I use diesel, and if I opted for Pennzoil for instance, it would be 10-40.
I'm talking about all the people who go to the dealer to get all their servicing done, and MANY of them do reach the mileages I mention above. The dealers would use the factory recommended oils in most cases unless the owner says different, but most wouldn't know to do that.
Ok, I do not remember seeing the reason for the high psi numbers for some of the oils in the blog. The blogger believes the higher psi numbers equal better oil protection for the motor. The higher pressures are achieved by adding Gear Lub shock resistant additives. Those additives do not make for better motor oil, since motor stresses are different than the pressure applied to a ring gear when the clutch is let out.
I do not have the proprietary formula for those oils, but I do remember being involved in a thread years ago where a retired oil engineer stated that the high numbers were due to GL additive. He stated it was a marketing scheme. Are you familiar with the NOACK test?? Where a steel bearing ball is coated in oil and spun while a metal plate is applied against it. Pressure is applied and measured, and the scarring left on the ball is too. Oils higher in GL additive do better. But the test results are skewed because the test does not reflect actual operating engine conditions.
But, it sure looks impressive to those seeing the test and who do not know. Motor oil is about TBN numbers, viscosity, moly, zinc, phosphorus levels, shearing, flowing, detergent levels, antacid protection and soforth caused by internal combustion, none of which is an issue for rear axles and differentials.
I do not have the proprietary formula for those oils, but I do remember being involved in a thread years ago where a retired oil engineer stated that the high numbers were due to GL additive. He stated it was a marketing scheme. Are you familiar with the NOACK test?? Where a steel bearing ball is coated in oil and spun while a metal plate is applied against it. Pressure is applied and measured, and the scarring left on the ball is too. Oils higher in GL additive do better. But the test results are skewed because the test does not reflect actual operating engine conditions.
But, it sure looks impressive to those seeing the test and who do not know. Motor oil is about TBN numbers, viscosity, moly, zinc, phosphorus levels, shearing, flowing, detergent levels, antacid protection and soforth caused by internal combustion, none of which is an issue for rear axles and differentials.
Yes, but you do not know what the owners actually used. You do not know what the results would be if the same type of oil, as in SN, were used but in 10-40 weight. The 40s flow. They act like heavier oils when hot and do not thicken which is a common misbelief. Also, the engines you are talking about are OE motors in trucks and soforth. Vehicles on this forum are heavily modded which adds additional stress to engine components.
My 99 TA had a heads and XER cam package installed at 32,000 miles. Stock bottom end & daily driver type use mostly so I used 5w-30 Mobile 1 synthetic from new to 165,000 miles. No oil related issues. Oil pressure was a solid 40 when hot at idle. My set up only made 418 whp but definitely more than stock. The 5w-30 will kept XER cam lobes & the stock LS1 lifters alive for at 132,000+ miles. However, if going road racing definitely Castrol Syntec Edge10w-40 time. Motor was replaced in quest for more hp but ran fine the day it was pulled.
389,500 miles 91 RS mostly 5w-30 Mobile 1 synthetic. The original engine ran perfect the day it was pulled for the LS swap. No oil related issues.
My 72 vette's Dart 400 was set up for 10w-40 per the engine builder. The car sits a lot is more of a nice weekends only car. The 10w-40 oil film tends to stay a little better on valve train parts than the thinner stuff. The vette also tends to see harder driving than the other cars.
In daily driver type cars, like my 99 TA most of the wear & teR happens on start up or cold start. Thinner 5w-30 or 10w30 oil that flow fast is better than thicker. Track day stuff, road racing etc definitely time to step up to heavier oil
I think best oil choice really depends on application, how the engine is being used and what the engine builder set the motor up to use. GM even mentions using heavier oil for track day events for the 6th Gen 1LE SS and similar new cars. That can mean some extra oil changes but that's really not a big deal.
My 99 TA had a heads and XER cam package installed at 32,000 miles. Stock bottom end & daily driver type use mostly so I used 5w-30 Mobile 1 synthetic from new to 165,000 miles. No oil related issues. Oil pressure was a solid 40 when hot at idle. My set up only made 418 whp but definitely more than stock. The 5w-30 will kept XER cam lobes & the stock LS1 lifters alive for at 132,000+ miles. However, if going road racing definitely Castrol Syntec Edge10w-40 time. Motor was replaced in quest for more hp but ran fine the day it was pulled.
389,500 miles 91 RS mostly 5w-30 Mobile 1 synthetic. The original engine ran perfect the day it was pulled for the LS swap. No oil related issues.
My 72 vette's Dart 400 was set up for 10w-40 per the engine builder. The car sits a lot is more of a nice weekends only car. The 10w-40 oil film tends to stay a little better on valve train parts than the thinner stuff. The vette also tends to see harder driving than the other cars.
In daily driver type cars, like my 99 TA most of the wear & teR happens on start up or cold start. Thinner 5w-30 or 10w30 oil that flow fast is better than thicker. Track day stuff, road racing etc definitely time to step up to heavier oil
My 99 TA had a heads and XER cam package installed at 32,000 miles. Stock bottom end & daily driver type use mostly so I used 5w-30 Mobile 1 synthetic from new to 165,000 miles. No oil related issues. Oil pressure was a solid 40 when hot at idle. My set up only made 418 whp but definitely more than stock. The 5w-30 will kept XER cam lobes & the stock LS1 lifters alive for at 132,000+ miles. However, if going road racing definitely Castrol Syntec Edge10w-40 time. Motor was replaced in quest for more hp but ran fine the day it was pulled.
389,500 miles 91 RS mostly 5w-30 Mobile 1 synthetic. The original engine ran perfect the day it was pulled for the LS swap. No oil related issues.
My 72 vette's Dart 400 was set up for 10w-40 per the engine builder. The car sits a lot is more of a nice weekends only car. The 10w-40 oil film tends to stay a little better on valve train parts than the thinner stuff. The vette also tends to see harder driving than the other cars.
In daily driver type cars, like my 99 TA most of the wear & teR happens on start up or cold start. Thinner 5w-30 or 10w30 oil that flow fast is better than thicker. Track day stuff, road racing etc definitely time to step up to heavier oil
Oil viscosity is measured at 212. You want an oil that holds 10 or higher on the viscosity index at that temp. Most OE 10-30 oils fall into the 9-10 range at that temp. All multi forties are higher than 10. The oil I use Delo 15-40 is closer to 15. And it gets worse as temps increase. For instance, when I do 20 minute heats oil temps rise to 260-270 on my motor. I do not know the shear strength of OE oils at those temps, but I think they fall to 7-8 range or less. I know that diesel oil will still provide shear strength of 10 or higher. The same as say 10-40 Pennzoil for instance.
I am not saying that you must use an older SL oil, or advocating any other type. I am saying that the extra viscosity provides peace of mind. I hope this helps the OP here. I take no set position. I am providing my personal experiences.
I'm starting to think the newer, thinner oils are one reason LS's and other new engines last like they do. On startup, oil gets EVERYWHERE RIGHT NOW. Minimal scuffing due to lack of oil on startup. The oil's ability to flow very quickly to all parts of the engine goes a long way toward warmup wear. Thinner oil "slings" in a finer spray, too, helping to get everywhere SOON.
I'm starting to think the newer, thinner oils are one reason LS's and other new engines last like they do. On startup, oil gets EVERYWHERE RIGHT NOW. Minimal scuffing due to lack of oil on startup. The oil's ability to flow very quickly to all parts of the engine goes a long way toward warmup wear. Thinner oil "slings" in a finer spray, too, helping to get everywhere SOON.
Also, I do not know what your experiences maybe with diesel oil, but it clings and clings. You cannot wipe it off your hands. So, I believe it provides adequate start up protection. And now I am done. I pointed out my thinking on the issue and you decide for yourself.
Yeah, MPGs are important to everyone. The problem I have with the manufacurers is that they recommend lighter oils for better MPG, but do not own the cars. The oil needs to take them to 100,000 miles, which is the end of emission warranty or ten years. You own the car years later and they do not care if it lasts longer.
I thought Holden was being honest with its customers and not trying to meet MPG goals alone. It recommended the oil it felt was truly best for the motor and not a government reg. Its hot in the south and the southwest and yet the manufactures recommend light oils. In Ford's case, 5-20s. Surely, its not for the good of the motor. Its good to meet regs and works well enough to take the car beyond warranty.
I submit this as an opinion, and we all know about opinions. But, the fact remains that at least in my motor there is little difference in idle pressure between the oils. So for peace of mind I use diesel, and if I opted for Pennzoil for instance, it would be 10-40.
I thought Holden was being honest with its customers and not trying to meet MPG goals alone. It recommended the oil it felt was truly best for the motor and not a government reg. Its hot in the south and the southwest and yet the manufactures recommend light oils. In Ford's case, 5-20s. Surely, its not for the good of the motor. Its good to meet regs and works well enough to take the car beyond warranty.
I submit this as an opinion, and we all know about opinions. But, the fact remains that at least in my motor there is little difference in idle pressure between the oils. So for peace of mind I use diesel, and if I opted for Pennzoil for instance, it would be 10-40.
Just to give you an idea of what I've personally experienced.. I bought my 2000 SS with 137k on it, I immediately went to work on it and had it tuned, did intake and headers and LS6 valve springs and turned the rev limiter to 6900. I BEAT and I mean reallllly BEAT the dog **** out of that motor every single day. No exaggeration, until I sold the car with 191k on it. The next owner raced it a lot and the guy after him. Car was totaled at 220k and consistently pulled on cammed cars. No engine issues. My 2004 Sierra.. I got it with 80k, same thing went and had it tuned immediately, rev limiter 6500 and drove it very hard daily. I like to have fun on my commute. Sold it at 190k, not a single issue with the motor and held 45-50 ish psi at idle and around 80 psi while revving.
The camaro I usually ran conventional and changed the oil at 2500-3000 miles, the truck I ran synthetic and ran about 8000 miles per oil change. Ran recommended oil weight in both.
On my 95 GSR, I had a LS bottom end that was factory rated at 6800 rpm rev limit, I took it to 8100 daily for 2 years with a turbo at 7 psi, ran recommended oil and it finally died when I accidentally let it get low on oil and did a 8k rpm 5th gear pull against a gsxr on the highway.
So me personally, I've had excellent luck with "thin" oil mixed with lots of abuse.
However, I wasn't stupid with things either, I always made sure everything was up to operating temp before hammering on it and in general was smart about the hammering.
I know this doesn't prove anything for all cars or situations, just figured I'd give you some info to add to your mental data base.
Thanks for sharing the in depth stuff, I'll go through and read thoroughly soon.
FWIW:
14. 5W30 Mobil 1, Advanced Full Synthetic, API SN, GM dexos 1 approved = 117,799 psi
zinc = TBD
phos = TBD
moly = TBD
This was the latest current version of this oil when tested at the end of 2015. This oil is used by a number of Auto Makers worldwide as factory fill oil in their High Performance cars. The psi value of this oil, which came from testing it at the normal operating test temperature of 230*F, put it in the INCREDIBLE Wear Protection Category.
However, I went on to also test this oil at the much higher temperature of 275*F. At that elevated temperature, any hotter and thinner oil is expected to experience a drop in Wear Protection Capability. And this oil did have a disappointing 36% drop in capability. At that reduced value down to 75,861 psi, this much hotter and thinner oil dropped down to the GOOD Wear Protection Category. You can avoid such a drop in capability by keeping the oil at a more reasonable cooler temperature.
zinc = TBD
phos = TBD
moly = TBD
This was the latest current version of this oil when tested at the end of 2015. This oil is used by a number of Auto Makers worldwide as factory fill oil in their High Performance cars. The psi value of this oil, which came from testing it at the normal operating test temperature of 230*F, put it in the INCREDIBLE Wear Protection Category.
However, I went on to also test this oil at the much higher temperature of 275*F. At that elevated temperature, any hotter and thinner oil is expected to experience a drop in Wear Protection Capability. And this oil did have a disappointing 36% drop in capability. At that reduced value down to 75,861 psi, this much hotter and thinner oil dropped down to the GOOD Wear Protection Category. You can avoid such a drop in capability by keeping the oil at a more reasonable cooler temperature.
IMO stick with what works IDK why people overthink this. (money no object I would go Amsoil, but for double the price the reward isn't there)
I run full synthetic throughout the entire engine's life, even when new. Synthetic is proven, and far superior to conventional oils in every way possible. I would not be interested in purchasing an engine nowadays if I had knowledge of a previous owner running conventional oil or "diesel" oil in place of the correct oils. I personally prefer Mobil 1 or Valvoline.
My 2500hd is at 300k and still runs like new and when I did the pan gasket it looked perfect inside zero sludge just a nice caramel coloring. I run Rotella 15-40 and it has treated me well. For what it's worth I live in Texas and it's hot lol
I run full synthetic throughout the entire engine's life, even when new. Synthetic is proven, and far superior to conventional oils in every way possible. I would not be interested in purchasing an engine nowadays if I had knowledge of a previous owner running conventional oil or "diesel" oil in place of the correct oils. I personally prefer Mobil 1 or Valvoline.
The makers are supposed to use base stock 4 oils. But, in recent years they have been allowed to use Base 2 and 3 stocks, the same as conventional oil. They are allowed to call it "synthetic" because it is processed differently than conventional oil. Very few base 4 synthetics are made because of cost. Redline and Amsoil for instance still use base 4 stocks and you pay up for it. Mobile 1, Pennzoil, etc. use base 3 and 2 stocks.
Advances in cracking conventional oil have made it similar in quality to synthetics. Delo 400 is made with the "Isosyn" process and is nearly as uniform as synthetics. It uses the same base stocks 2 and 3. I not flying a jet. So, why pay up substantially for oil that is good to 35 below. This is true of most conventional oil today.
Also, because of cost people tend to do more frequent oil changes with conventional oil and drain any contaminants out. I am not saying you will not have good results with synthetics, I am saying why pay more? Finally, the reason you can buy Mobile 1 and others relatively cheaply is because those oils are not using base 4 stocks. But, to say you would not want a car that used diesel oil before is wrong. BTW, you can use diesel oil in a gasoline motor, but not motor oil in a diesel. Besides, I also use it for the Harley. I hope this sheds some light.
TECH Fanatic




Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 252
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Oh that crazy old blog resurfaces again. It is misleading. The oils that have the higher PSI ratings are of no benefit. GL-5 additives are added to raise the shock pressure. Gear lub has these additives to cushion ring and pinion shock. It is unnecessary for motor oil and is an oil producer marketing scheme.
The 2 highest PSI scoring oils out of the bottle in the referenced blog, with no additional additives,
(except by the original manufacturer)
were # 2 AMSOIL Signature Series 5W-30 and
#1 AMSOIL Signature Series 0W-20.
BTW AMSOIL does not market or even refer to this specific test in any of its marketing material.
(Full Disclosure... AMSOIL User & Dealer since 1989)
Both of these oils are low ZDDP, below 1000 PPM and with regard to GL-5 additives I am quite sure you are not privy
to their formulations. They also provide very little loss of protection @ 275*
With the onset of Thermal Degradation @ 290*
INCORRECT!
The 2 highest PSI scoring oils out of the bottle in the referenced blog, with no additional additives,
(except by the original manufacturer)
were # 2 AMSOIL Signature Series 5W-30 and
#1 AMSOIL Signature Series 0W-20.
BTW AMSOIL does not market or even refer to this specific test in any of its marketing material.
(Full Disclosure... AMSOIL User & Dealer since 1989)
Both of these oils are low ZDDP, below 1000 PPM and with regard to GL-5 additives I am quite sure you are not privy
to their formulations. They also provide very little loss of protection @ 275*
With the onset of Thermal Degradation @ 290*
The 2 highest PSI scoring oils out of the bottle in the referenced blog, with no additional additives,
(except by the original manufacturer)
were # 2 AMSOIL Signature Series 5W-30 and
#1 AMSOIL Signature Series 0W-20.
BTW AMSOIL does not market or even refer to this specific test in any of its marketing material.
(Full Disclosure... AMSOIL User & Dealer since 1989)
Both of these oils are low ZDDP, below 1000 PPM and with regard to GL-5 additives I am quite sure you are not privy
to their formulations. They also provide very little loss of protection @ 275*
With the onset of Thermal Degradation @ 290*
I would gladly use the amsoil if it were 23$ in a 5 qt jug like the 0-40 is priced at wally world !! ( if you can get me that deal contact me !!! )
yes, familiar with the test. It would seem to me that the higher numbers would indicate a better product. The oils that he put the additives in, which he clearly states which ones he did, and he didn’t do that many, it made some oils better, and it made a lot of them worse, which he’s quick to tell in the testing. Just looking for outside info from others really.
Last edited by foxsl; Aug 30, 2018 at 02:03 AM.









