1999 LS1 Cam
99 Trans Am, 6 spd, WS6. Question on a Cam choice. Good or okay choice of a 218/224 528,535 114 lobe? Car already has installed headers, high flow cats, and magnaflow catback?
Thanks
Go to Texas Speed, BTR, Cam motion, WS6store, and Summits websites and look at their cams. They make excellent cams, all pretty much better than that one.
I would look more in the range of something like a 226-229 intake duration, 230-235 exh duration, 600/600 lift, 112 ish LSA.
If you want a wilder cam you can go low 230's on the intake upper 230's exhaust. If you want extreme look at upper 230's intake and 240's exhaust, I would not go that high though, just gives up so much low end and driveability.
Thanks
Unless there is some special circumstances, I'd select a different cam. That looks like the specs for the sort of cams in favor 20 years ago in 1999. Back then quality valve springs for an aggressive LS1 cam was an issue plus the timing software was less capable.
00pooterSS gave lot of excellent information.
The Summit Stage 1 LS Ghost Cam. 222/233 115+3, .600/.575 Lift is the smallest cam I'd consider these days unless local emissions testing is an issue etc.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Mine with a LS6 intake, long tube headers and tune did 353, but it also had a stall converter so it would dyno higher if it didn't or if it were a manual trans.
Yours likely does 350 due to the headers and a tune.
The specs you provided will give you -7 degrees of overlap. You usually want +2 to +4 degrees of overlap in an N/A street build.
maybe you didn’t see Mavn thread. N/a he made over 440rwhp out of a stock bottom end ls1. That’s better than most bigger na specific cams, it’s not rowdy and it drives good, easy to tune and his car ran 11.10@122 all motor. 4th gen trans am. That’s enough convincing for me. Bigger ain’t always better.












