Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Boosted to NA 5.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2019 | 08:59 PM
  #1  
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 1
Default Boosted to NA 5.3

Hey guys,

I run a boosted 5.3 in my Miata for Time Attack road racing. Ive been contemplating going NA for a variety of reasons. Its a 2003 block, 6.098 H beam rods, 11.5:1 +2cc dome pistons, ARP main/head studs. It currently has a ls6 cam in it, new stock lifters, stock length Comp Cams push rods, upgraded rockers, I forgot what springs I put in it but they arent dual springs. 706 heads, stock valves.

it worked well boosted, made over 720 whp. The problem is I dont need that much power, I would like to be around 500whp NA, we run 112 fuel in it. Is it possible with this bottom end? Obviously a proper cam, and probably cylinder heads? This car doesnt get driven on the street we currently run it up to 7800rpm. If its possible to make that power I save 80+lbs of turbo ****, more reliable, less overall heat in the car to try and manage
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2019 | 10:18 PM
  #2  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

The bottom end WILL handle the power.
It DOES handle the present 720+ HP, so I'm not sure why you are asking the question.
A good pair of nicely ported 243/799 heads will handle the power, but you will need a serious cam with good mid range for road racing.
Call Cam Motion or TSP for good advice there.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2019 | 10:33 PM
  #3  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

With current heads and bottom end I dont forsee 500whp being possible.

Not enough compression to run a cam large enough to spin high enough to make the power. Of course if you did have the rpm you'd need the cyl head to support it.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2019 | 10:45 PM
  #4  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

And gm lifters spinning to 7800? Geeeeez.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 07:51 AM
  #5  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,872
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
With current heads and bottom end I dont forsee 500whp being possible.

Not enough compression to run a cam large enough to spin high enough to make the power. Of course if you did have the rpm you'd need the cyl head to support it.
I agree. At least not with 7800 redline. Why not run a centri and keep the boost to about 8 psi? Probably a lot less work given the way your motor is already set up.

*insert DDnSPider surprised reaction at my suggesting boost here...*
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 08:14 AM
  #6  
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
The bottom end WILL handle the power.
It DOES handle the present 720+ HP, so I'm not sure why you are asking the question.
A good pair of nicely ported 243/799 heads will handle the power, but you will need a serious cam with good mid range for road racing.
Call Cam Motion or TSP for good advice there.
sorry I shouldve been more specific, I know the bottom end can handle it.

I guess I was asking if its possible with the current compression ratio or if it was too low. If we kept the 11:5.1 pistons, got a better head and cam if it is was going to be possible. Seems like all the reading Ive done suggests its not enough compression. Ill give TSP today and see what they recommend. I did a dcr calculator this morning and with the ls6 cam its only 6.75:1. Thats seems terrible lol
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 08:19 AM
  #7  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I agree. At least not with 7800 redline. Why not run a centri and keep the boost to about 8 psi? Probably a lot less work given the way your motor is already set up.

*insert DDnSPider surprised reaction at my suggesting boost here...*
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
Kfxguy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 758
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
Hey guys,

I run a boosted 5.3 in my Miata for Time Attack road racing. Ive been contemplating going NA for a variety of reasons. Its a 2003 block, 6.098 H beam rods, 11.5:1 +2cc dome pistons, ARP main/head studs. It currently has a ls6 cam in it, new stock lifters, stock length Comp Cams push rods, upgraded rockers, I forgot what springs I put in it but they arent dual springs. 706 heads, stock valves.

it worked well boosted, made over 720 whp. The problem is I dont need that much power, I would like to be around 500whp NA, we run 112 fuel in it. Is it possible with this bottom end? Obviously a proper cam, and probably cylinder heads? This car doesnt get driven on the street we currently run it up to 7800rpm. If its possible to make that power I save 80+lbs of turbo ****, more reliable, less overall heat in the car to try and manage

What boost are you running to make 720whp?


If you dont need that much power, can you not just turn the boost/timing down?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 09:14 AM
  #9  
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Kfxguy
What boost are you running to make 720whp?


If you dont need that much power, can you not just turn the boost/timing down?
that was around 26lbs on old 5.3 stock dished pistons. It hasnt been back to the dyno since we put the new bottom end together. But we have the timing turned down already because I raised the compression. Before I we had around 18-19 of timing in it. I think now it was somewhere around 12 I dont remember exactly. But its a dog out of the corners now. Thats why I was thinking if it could make the power NA we could crank the timing back to it and get the drive off the corner again.

other option would be to go with a smaller turbo so it lights off quicker. This is an old on3 88mm, probably not suited for road racing
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 09:26 AM
  #10  
Kfxguy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 758
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
that was around 26lbs on old 5.3 stock dished pistons. It hasnt been back to the dyno since we put the new bottom end together. But we have the timing turned down already because I raised the compression. Before I we had around 18-19 of timing in it. I think now it was somewhere around 12 I dont remember exactly. But its a dog out of the corners now. Thats why I was thinking if it could make the power NA we could crank the timing back to it and get the drive off the corner again.

other option would be to go with a smaller turbo so it lights off quicker. This is an old on3 88mm, probably not suited for road racing

ok. I ask because Im building a 5.3 right now and was thinking about going with a stock(ish) cam. Id be happy with about 750whp but not at that boost pressure.

so you say the lower compression motor was more responsive because of added timing? If so, thats good to know because Im doing the opposite of what you did, Im going from high compression to lower compression.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 09:59 AM
  #11  
Mavn's Avatar
"I MAID THEESE"
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 701
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by Kfxguy
ok. I ask because Im building a 5.3 right now and was thinking about going with a stock(ish) cam. Id be happy with about 750whp but not at that boost pressure.

so you say the lower compression motor was more responsive because of added timing? If so, thats good to know because Im doing the opposite of what you did, Im going from high compression to lower compression.
Only way you're making 750 wheel on a 5.3 is 20-25# 🙏
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 10:09 AM
  #12  
kinglt-1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 253
From: Ft. Wayne, IN
Default

The problem is you have the wrong power adder. It's either larger cube NA or PD supercharger for road racing. 5.3 won't touch 520whp NA and have any kind of power under the curve. I would put a TVS 2300 on it and run 8-10psi. You will make the power under the curve you need for accelerating out of the corner.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 10:29 AM
  #13  
Mavn's Avatar
"I MAID THEESE"
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 701
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
The problem is you have the wrong power adder. It's either larger cube NA or PD supercharger for road racing. 5.3 won't touch 520whp NA and have any kind of power under the curve. I would put a TVS 2300 on it and run 8-10psi. You will make the power under the curve you need for accelerating out of the corner.
Good *** advice ! Or run a very small 70mm ish turbo that only makes 550 ish wheel on your 5.3 MAXED out . That spools instantly
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 11:25 AM
  #14  
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,025
Likes: 952
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
I agree. At least not with 7800 redline. Why not run a centri and keep the boost to about 8 psi? Probably a lot less work given the way your motor is already set up.

*insert DDnSPider surprised reaction at my suggesting boost here...*
He wants more jams out of the corners not less, centri blowers are dogs down low, worse then a properly sized turbo.

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
And gm lifters spinning to 7800? Geeeeez.
They love it!

Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
that was around 26lbs on old 5.3 stock dished pistons. It hasnt been back to the dyno since we put the new bottom end together. But we have the timing turned down already because I raised the compression. Before I we had around 18-19 of timing in it. I think now it was somewhere around 12 I dont remember exactly. But its a dog out of the corners now. Thats why I was thinking if it could make the power NA we could crank the timing back to it and get the drive off the corner again.

other option would be to go with a smaller turbo so it lights off quicker. This is an old on3 88mm, probably not suited for road racing
5.3 has zero chance of making 500whp. I would 100% ditch the 88mm for your needs as its way overkill. Get something like the next gen billet 78/75 run a bit lower boost and more timing, make for a more responsive combo overall.

Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 04:19 PM
  #15  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,802
Likes: 5,135
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by RyanRaduechel
that was around 26lbs on old 5.3 stock dished pistons. It hasnt been back to the dyno since we put the new bottom end together. But we have the timing turned down already because I raised the compression. Before I we had around 18-19 of timing in it. I think now it was somewhere around 12 I dont remember exactly. But its a dog out of the corners now. Thats why I was thinking if it could make the power NA we could crank the timing back to it and get the drive off the corner again.

other option would be to go with a smaller turbo so it lights off quicker. This is an old on3 88mm, probably not suited for road racing
If your set on going N/A and you want to get off the corners, Id personally go with cubic inches. That car is begging for an aluminum engine to get weight off the nose. Look into an LS3 or an LS7 block with a set of heads that produce crazy fast velocity, cam the thing properly and spend money on valvetrain. Your just not gonna find the torque you want with a N/A 5.3 for road racing. Prolly not the answer you wanted, but its what Id look into...
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 08:41 PM
  #16  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

Could have heads ported and hollow valves put in by texas speed. Then have then spec a torquey cam for it and put a fast 102 ported on top Should make 420 wheel hp and 390 torque (guessing) and have a usuable power curve. 720whp seems like a lot to handle in a miatas for a road course...and I know enough about road course to understand that high hp cars aren't always the fastest.around the track
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2019 | 10:43 PM
  #17  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 109
From: Ohio
Default

Swap in an S362 and run like 14 PSI. You'll make 550whp and 650wtq with twice the responsiveness.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2019 | 09:36 PM
  #18  
RyanRaduechel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 12
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
If your set on going N/A and you want to get off the corners, Id personally go with cubic inches. That car is begging for an aluminum engine to get weight off the nose. Look into an LS3 or an LS7 block with a set of heads that produce crazy fast velocity, cam the thing properly and spend money on valvetrain. Your just not gonna find the torque you want with a N/A 5.3 for road racing. Prolly not the answer you wanted, but its what Id look into...
it has an aluminum 5.3 in it already, the original engine was an iron block 5.3 that we used when doing 1/2 mile racing. That was replaced with this aluminum 5.3

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
He wants more jams out of the corners not less, centri blowers are dogs down low, worse then a properly sized turbo.



They love it!



5.3 has zero chance of making 500whp. I would 100% ditch the 88mm for your needs as its way overkill. Get something like the next gen billet 78/75 run a bit lower boost and more timing, make for a more responsive combo overall.
yes, I spoke with Texas speed on Friday and its not looking great NA with the little 5.3 that couldnt lol. Going to go with a BW S372SX I think. The turbo will end up getting moved and possibly thinking of going to a w2a with an ice box. Get the nose of the car sealed up.

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
Could have heads ported and hollow valves put in by texas speed. Then have then spec a torquey cam for it and put a fast 102 ported on top Should make 420 wheel hp and 390 torque (guessing) and have a usuable power curve. 720whp seems like a lot to handle in a miatas for a road course...and I know enough about road course to understand that high hp cars aren't always the fastest.around the track
420 hp isnt enough. These boys are making serious power in the Global Time Attack series, big turbo 2jz, twin turbo ls stuff, nasty big cubic inch NA ls stuff. We are gonna downsize the turbo, work on better boost control and get back after it.

this is the car





Reply
Old Nov 24, 2019 | 09:48 PM
  #19  
gjestico's Avatar
TECH Regular
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 433
Likes: 40
From: Vancouver area, West coast Canada
Default

Youre able to put that HP to the ground ? Car looks like its 2500Lbs. What kind of speeds are you doing out of the corners ?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2019 | 11:15 PM
  #20  
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
TECH Addict
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 480
From: PDX-OR-USA
Default

Helped a friend do a road C5 corvette with a standard crate 350 in it,, the recipe was to build a motor with RPM's ..
It was a 406 Sprint car buildup,, with the rev limited to 8200 (On the oval this motor would be turning 10,500)
Iron block aluminum heads, and the rotating assembly was scat/carillo/Mahle IIRC..
Good luck

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.