Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lq4 or ls1?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2020, 10:54 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Lq4 or ls1?!

So I am fort3enough to have some choices on my build.. I have a 2000 ls1 and a 2000 lq4 to throw in the truck. Either way it's going to be backed up by a freshened up mostly stock t56 out of an fbody with a McLeod twin disk clutch. Already have an On3 76mm turbo, most of the turbo kit, stage 3 TSP truck cam, eagle forged I beam rods and exhaust from the down pipe back. It's already a 5 speed truck so that part is taken care of and either engine will mostly drop right in.. My goal is to be around 750 wheel horsepower at 10 psi. Back to the real question though, ls1 or lq4? Truck is a 99 rcsb 2wd.

Last edited by Mongothemango; 06-28-2020 at 10:56 PM. Reason: Adding vehicle information
Old 06-28-2020, 11:21 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,739
Received 844 Likes on 646 Posts

Default

6.0 for turbo and slightly less compression
Old 06-28-2020, 11:23 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,153
Received 3,121 Likes on 2,434 Posts
Default

LQ4. Already has low compression (9.4:1) in light of it getting turbo boost, plus the extra displacement will help move the heavy truck. Besides, if you blow it, they're far easier to find than LS1's
Old 06-29-2020, 12:21 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
LQ4. Already has low compression (9.4:1) in light of it getting turbo boost, plus the extra displacement will help move the heavy truck. Besides, if you blow it, they're far easier to find than LS1's
i already have both engines. Will be throwing in a forged rotating assembly either way so compression is going to be around 9:1 with around 30 ring gap. Going to be a weekend warrior.

Last edited by Mongothemango; 12-12-2020 at 11:19 PM.
Old 06-29-2020, 12:28 AM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
6.0 for turbo and slightly less compression
Will be putting in forged pistons in so I can drop the compression if I go ls1.
Old 06-29-2020, 01:24 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,153
Received 3,121 Likes on 2,434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongothemango
Will be putting in forged pistons in so I can drop the compression if I go ls1.
What do you see as any advantage the LS1 has? The cylinder walls are much thinner on the LS1 block.
The following users liked this post:
wannafbody (06-29-2020)
Old 06-29-2020, 01:34 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
What do you see as any advantage the LS1 has? The cylinder walls are much thinner on the LS1 block.
I have no idea when it comes to the thickness difference with these two, no doubt the ls1 will be fine with ten to fifteen pounds with forged rods and pistons though. Advantages of ls1 is wieght, more room for the turbo stuffs since the accessories are slightly shorter than truck accessories and having round port heads for an aftermarket intake to feed that healthy cam. I will surely need bigger injectors and another fuel pump either way I go. Lq4 advantages are that I can probably go a lot more boost and the displacement difference. That turbo is going to have trouble keeping up with the 6.0 over 5k rpms though right?
Old 06-29-2020, 11:28 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,153
Received 3,121 Likes on 2,434 Posts
Default

Any front end accessory setup fits any LS block.
Both the LS6 and LQ4 have cathedral port heads, port sizes being nearly identical.
I don't know where you are getting your info.
The following users liked this post:
Ls7colorado (07-02-2020)
Old 06-29-2020, 12:52 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
rogergm92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 117
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I would go with the LS1 (assuming you already have both)

the higher the compression, the higher the HP. You are not going 11:1 so dont bother to think that the lower compression will make the LQ4 better for boost.

Also you will be lighter.

The LS1 is solid, first you will break a rod or a cylinder before a cylinder wall. BTW stock internals with gap will get you over 750whp easily
Old 06-29-2020, 12:58 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
rogergm92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 117
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Just drop in a LS6 intake from the Bahrain user that sells them in here (or a TBSS if you have space). BTW the stock truck intake from the LQ4 is better than the LS1 intake (LS1 intake < truck intake = LS6 intake < TBSS intake < fast 102 or msd)
fuel pump with regulator (450lph or twin 255 with hobbs switch)
SEP injectors or flow matched siemens deka 80lb or the 120lb
TUNE FOR GOD SAKE with
SS2 cam or Summit stage 2 turbo cam WITH SPRINGS
Billet china turbo with all the goodies (74mm to 80mm anything in there is good for a 5.7 6.0)
Old 06-29-2020, 01:46 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Any front end accessory setup fits any LS block.
Both the LS6 and LQ4 have cathedral port heads, port sizes being nearly identical.
I don't know where you are getting your info.
yes, I am aware that both sets of accessories will fit either block. I did not know that the ls1 has cathedral heads as well that was simply me being wrong. Thank you for the input.
Old 06-29-2020, 01:50 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rogergm92
I would go with the LS1 (assuming you already have both)

the higher the compression, the higher the HP. You are not going 11:1 so dont bother to think that the lower compression will make the LQ4 better for boost.

Also you will be lighter.

The LS1 is solid, first you will break a rod or a cylinder before a cylinder wall. BTW stock internals with gap will get you over 750whp easily
yes, I have both engines and everything that i mentioned in the post minus the t56 a buddy is hanging on to it for me. Ls1 has 174k on it so I figure if I bulletproof it, should run forever on low boost. The lq4 has 140k so same with it.. i was thinking dished summit forged pistons with the rods that I already have.
Old 06-29-2020, 01:55 PM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rogergm92
Just drop in a LS6 intake from the Bahrain user that sells them in here (or a TBSS if you have space). BTW the stock truck intake from the LQ4 is better than the LS1 intake (LS1 intake < truck intake = LS6 intake < TBSS intake < fast 102 or msd)
fuel pump with regulator (450lph or twin 255 with hobbs switch)
SEP injectors or flow matched siemens deka 80lb or the 120lb
TUNE FOR GOD SAKE with
SS2 cam or Summit stage 2 turbo cam WITH SPRINGS
Billet china turbo with all the goodies (74mm to 80mm anything in there is good for a 5.7 6.0)
i will probably go with the truck intake, Ihave a few laying around. HP tuners. Already have the turbo and cam kit with push rods and springs.
Old 06-29-2020, 05:59 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,153
Received 3,121 Likes on 2,434 Posts
Default

Every Gen III LS engine has cathedral heads.
Old 06-29-2020, 06:09 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Every Gen III LS engine has cathedral heads.
that is great information to know, for some reason I thought that the aluminum blocks that came in the cars had squared intake ports. I guess that leaves the advantage of wieght then. My big problem is that I can't sell the ls1, if I could get some decent money for it then I would just go with the lq4.
Old 06-29-2020, 09:04 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,739
Received 844 Likes on 646 Posts

Default

6.0 in HD trucks got squart ports in 08
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (06-29-2020)
Old 07-01-2020, 07:34 AM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Redbull87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 791
Received 49 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Id go with the lq4 for your goals.Mill the stock heads for a lil compression bump.It wont need large amount of boost and use a small meth kit if you run pump gas.Easy 750whp and broader powerband/torque curve fun for the street/strip.
The following users liked this post:
War Prayer (03-01-2021)
Old 07-02-2020, 11:46 AM
  #18  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mongothemango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redbull87
Id go with the lq4 for your goals.Mill the stock heads for a lil compression bump.It wont need large amount of boost and use a small meth kit if you run pump gas.Easy 750whp and broader powerband/torque curve fun for the street/strip.
i was considering e85 since I won't be after crazy power. That doable?
Old 07-03-2020, 10:24 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
omc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 1,539
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
What do you see as any advantage the LS1 has? The cylinder walls are much thinner on the LS1 block.
Yes the LQ4 has advantages of bigger selection of heads to choose from allows for bigger valves and more room to grow later down the the road..But t LS1 biggest advantage is weight so if this was for n/a race purpose especially autocross , trackX or road racing it might get the nod .
Old 07-03-2020, 12:19 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,153
Received 3,121 Likes on 2,434 Posts
Default

ANY aluminum LS block has that advantage. But since it's going in a truck, the weight difference will not be nearly as apparent as in a lighter car. IMHO the LQ4 would still be a better choice due to the additional low end torque.


Quick Reply: Lq4 or ls1?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 PM.