Found some markings on the rods.
I can’t find the TSB info anymore but I believe GM actually replaced the pistons in some of these motors with pistons that had coated skirts and or rings. The early LS motors did not have OE coated skirts.
So if I had to guess either that engine was a slapper or a heavy oil consumer at some point and they at a minimum pulled the pistons to rering it if not put new slugs in. Thus the date on the cap.
As for the 0300. That’s either a tech employee ID or possibly the tech wrote the root reason he was in there P0300 (multiple cylinder misfire) which could trigger if the slap was bad enough or it was consuming enough oil. These are all SWAGs (sophisticated wild *** guesses). But that’s what I’d tell myself.
Last edited by kossuth; Oct 15, 2023 at 07:33 PM.
I can’t find the TSB info anymore but I believe GM actually replaced the pistons in some of these motors with pistons that had coated skirts and or rings. The early LS motors did not have OE coated skirts.
So if I had to guess either that engine was a slapper or a heavy oil consumer at some point and they at a minimum pulled the pistons to rering it if not put new slugs in. Thus the date on the cap.
As for the 0300. That’s either a tech employee ID or possibly the tech wrote the root reason he was in there P0300 (multiple cylinder misfire) which could trigger if the slap was bad enough or it was consuming enough oil. These are all SWAGs (sophisticated wild *** guesses). But that’s what I’d tell myself.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time








