Novice Engine Builder - Need Help With Cam Selection
If I go with the Tick, should I run .600” springs (PAC 1218) or the .625” springs (PAC 1219)?
The product page on Ticks website says 1219s will work, but I’m not sure if others think it’ll be too much spring on a .571”/.561” cam.
For your 402, the Vinci and Summit are so close, it's there's really not going to be a noticeable difference. I'd go with the less expensive option.
The Tick will have a slightly smoother idle with a little more vacuum. But again, with a 402+ it won't have the same impact as it would on say a 6.2 or 5.3. It'll definitely leave some mid-range and top end power on the table due to both the intake duration and the lift on both lobes compared to the other two. If you were concerned about catalysts and running a little cleaner on emissions than it'd have an advantage due to less overlap. It's a small cam for an engine that size.
IVC is good for low down performance with that Tick cam too. I was going to try this Mast 214/222 .600/.600 cam with CNC ported 241 and a FAST 92 in another 5.7 project, but it didn't come to be. Sort of similar. So, I would pick the Tick out of those 3.
https://www.mastmotorsports.com/products/lsx-cam-100253
Last edited by Pulse Red; Jun 26, 2024 at 03:48 AM.
I like the Summit cam with the slightly higher lift. Even though stock cathedral heads "stall" at .550" lift, a .600" lift cam will make more power. A .600" lift cam is at .550" lift for a longer amount of time than a .550" cam. That little bit of extra lift makes a difference. Summit also has a really nice dual spring kit for .600" lift cams. This should be the part number: SME-174003.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Stock 6.0l head flow data
Here’s some results of a recent flow test of a #317 casting. The head looked to be pretty average as far as core shift goes. I tested the two center cylinders. Interesting to note how the second intake port tested flowed extremely well to .450” lift, then settled back down to it’s peak average. The test was performed on a SF600 flow bench.
Lift___Cyl1Int.____Cyl2Int.____Cyl1Exh.____Cyl2Exh .___Cyl2Exh w/out pipe
.100___64.8_______65.9_______56.6_______57.1______ ___53.3
.150___101.7______103.9______92.1_______92.1______ ___87.8
.200___142.1______141.8______113.1______116.1_____ ___111.6
.250___177.7______177.1______133.8______139.4_____ ___131.8
.300___204.3______203.4______152.1______157.8_____ ___146.8
.350___224.3______224.9______159.8______165.8_____ ___157.1
.400___233.5______242.9______171.6______175.8_____ ___164.9
.450___241.4______252.5______181.2______184.8_____ ___166.8
.500___250.0______247.0______190.6______200.4_____ ___174.2
.550___251.2______250.9______197.9______200.1_____ ___181.2
.575___253.0______251.1______199.3______202.1_____ ___183.0
.600___253.0______251.9______200.4______203.0_____ ___184.4
.625___252.2______252.2______200.9______204.1_____ ___184.8
.650___253.1______252.2______201.7______205.2_____ ___185.3
Intake runner volume = 208.5cc
Exhaust runner volume = 77.0cc
Combustion chamber volume = 72.4cc
Test bore dia. = 4.030”
The intake ports were tested with a radius flow plate and cyl. #1&2 exhaust ports were tested with a 2.0” stub pipe."
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time










