Power under the curve.
#1
Power under the curve.
I've run into this phrase before and was wanting to know what it meant. Usually when this is mentioned, I read that its not about how much peak power your car makes, its all about power under the curve. What exactly does that mean? Because Ive seen cars with substantially less amount of peak power than other cars run faster at the track, I assume because he has better power under the curve. Obviously car owners that are solely concerned on track times dont care about dyno numbers, but what they put down on a slip. Power under the curve is what race car driver's are looking for and all others are just dyno queens. So can someone explain to me what this means? Thanks.
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have 2,700 posts and you don't know what this means? No offense man, but it's pretty much common sense. If you look at a dyno graph, it is just implying that the area under the curve is greater, even though it might make less peak power. In other words, the flatter the torque curve is, the more area there is under the curve, and the more "overall" power the car will have. If the power is lower at lower rpms, the torque curve would increase at a much higher rate (higher slope of the line), making less "power under the curve". I guess for racing, you would want the peak power, but for a street/strip car, "under the curve" is where it's at.
#3
Just because I have 2,700 posts doesnt mean that I know everything or just about everything. I asked a lot of questions and reply to them as well, that is why my post count is so high. Ive always read this phrase before and just ignored it, but I wanted to understand it if I ever came across it again. Are there any other ways to putting it because I still really dont understand.
#4
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BB, go find a dyno graph. Then read matts22's explanation with it in front of you. If you can't understand it after that, you're gonna need someone to draw you a picture(no offense intended). Power under the curve relates to how flat the torque band is, starting at what rpm's, in relation to where your hp really starts picking up. Power "under the curve" is concerned with how much power the car is making all along its power band, its a better measurement of how strong a setup is. Try and think about how much time your car spends @ 6000+ rpms....in relation to the band between 3000-6000 during racing. Thats why "under the curve" power is so important.
#5
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its really quite simple. The curve is defined what rpm you shift at and the rpm after the shift. This is the powerband youre most worried about during racing excluding the one during launch.
For example, say you shift at 6500rpms and the rpms drop down to 5000rpms after the shift. You want to maximize the average hp through this range. Lets say one cam makes more peak hp during this range but makes less average hp than another cam that makes less peak hp. The cam that makes better average hp will be quicker in the quarter mile even though it makes less peak hp than the other cam.
The power under the curve term gets thrown around a lot. I dont think people realize how narrow the curve is during racing. Typically, rpms rarely drop below 5k rpms during drag racing. A cam thats strong at 3k rpms makes the car fun to drive but doesnt make it any faster.
For example, say you shift at 6500rpms and the rpms drop down to 5000rpms after the shift. You want to maximize the average hp through this range. Lets say one cam makes more peak hp during this range but makes less average hp than another cam that makes less peak hp. The cam that makes better average hp will be quicker in the quarter mile even though it makes less peak hp than the other cam.
The power under the curve term gets thrown around a lot. I dont think people realize how narrow the curve is during racing. Typically, rpms rarely drop below 5k rpms during drag racing. A cam thats strong at 3k rpms makes the car fun to drive but doesnt make it any faster.
#6
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look here.
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/ed..._technobabble/
There's a fairly good explanation of "power under the curve" there. It's literally the area under the curve. The greater the area under the curve, the more useable power your engine is making.
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/ed..._technobabble/
There's a fairly good explanation of "power under the curve" there. It's literally the area under the curve. The greater the area under the curve, the more useable power your engine is making.
#7
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok.. I just fabbed these up using my own dyno sheet and a paint prog. This should make it simple to understand. Dont be offended by having to see it "drawn out" for you, its just REALLY easy to see what it means on paper.
The "area, or power, under the curve" is everything in red UNDER the dyno graph hp line.
Heres car "Y". Notice the hp line and all the red under it.. that is this cars "power under the curve"... it represents all the power the car is making.
Here is car "X". Notice the dyno graph hp line reaches max hp EARLIER then car "Y".... both cars peak the same hp buuuuuttt.. since car "X" reaches that max a lot earlier that means it will also have more "power under the curve". Meaning that all things equal car "X" will be significantly faster.
Easy to understand now huh?
The "area, or power, under the curve" is everything in red UNDER the dyno graph hp line.
Heres car "Y". Notice the hp line and all the red under it.. that is this cars "power under the curve"... it represents all the power the car is making.
Here is car "X". Notice the dyno graph hp line reaches max hp EARLIER then car "Y".... both cars peak the same hp buuuuuttt.. since car "X" reaches that max a lot earlier that means it will also have more "power under the curve". Meaning that all things equal car "X" will be significantly faster.
Easy to understand now huh?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for posting the pics, hopefully that will help explain it to him. But shouldn't it be for torque instead of horsepower? Because horsepower is just a calculation based on torque. Plus, the way you have the green line drawn has the torque and horsepower lines crossing way before they're supposed to (5250 I think or around that). The best way I could explain it is to look at the horsepower line and think of it as the torque line for another car. Compare that to the other torque line. Obviously, there is more area under the curve for the one that is higher throughout the rpm range (especially early on). This equals more power throughout the powerband, as there is more "area under the curve". Am I right on this?
#9
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matts22
Thanks for posting the pics, hopefully that will help explain it to him. But shouldn't it be for torque instead of horsepower? Because horsepower is just a calculation based on torque. Plus, the way you have the green line drawn has the torque and horsepower lines crossing way before they're supposed to (5250 I think or around that). The best way I could explain it is to look at the horsepower line and think of it as the torque line for another car. Compare that to the other torque line. Obviously, there is more area under the curve for the one that is higher throughout the rpm range (especially early on). This equals more power throughout the powerband, as there is more "area under the curve". Am I right on this?
Well.. the graph is nothing but a very simple tutorial... nothing more then to explain the "power under the curve." I couldve easily made the same example and kept them crossing at the same point. Didnt think about it though.
#10
11 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by matts22
Thanks for posting the pics, hopefully that will help explain it to him. But shouldn't it be for torque instead of horsepower?
Is it horsepower or torque that's most important? Who knows?!
#11
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I think of power under the curve, I think of 2000rpm - peak tq. This is where a over-cammed car will suffer. Usually, at around 5200 rpm the hp and tq curves cross and a larger cam will shine past this point.
In my opinion, its alot easier to focus on under the curve power by watching tq. HP is at such a rise, its hard to make comparisons. Look for the table flat, torque curve in the mid range.
Thats the way I understand it at least.
In my opinion, its alot easier to focus on under the curve power by watching tq. HP is at such a rise, its hard to make comparisons. Look for the table flat, torque curve in the mid range.
Thats the way I understand it at least.
#13
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by XTrooper
This is still a question of great contention even among the "experts."
Is it horsepower or torque that's most important? Who knows?!
Is it horsepower or torque that's most important? Who knows?!
I ran across this article a few years ago. After reading it then, and re-reading it a few minutes ago, it seems to me that what really matters is horsepower. And as the late Smokey Yunick put it, "...it's not how much horsepower you have at the start of the race, it's how much horsepower you have at the finish line"
#14
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by Pimp_Nas_T
I ran across this article a few years ago. After reading it then, and re-reading it a few minutes ago, it seems to me that what really matters is horsepower. And as the late Smokey Yunick put it, "...it's not how much horsepower you have at the start of the race, it's how much horsepower you have at the finish line"
"It's how much trq you have at 60' and how much HP at the end."
Torq is an acceleration figure while HP is a trap speed figure. A high trapping car doesn't mean it's the quickest.
#17
TECH Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by XTrooper
This is still a question of great contention even among the "experts."
Is it horsepower or torque that's most important? Who knows?!
Is it horsepower or torque that's most important? Who knows?!
You need both to go fast.
#18
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia!
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Sure but in drag,
"It's how much trq you have at 60' and how much HP at the end."
Torq is an acceleration figure while HP is a trap speed figure. A high trapping car doesn't mean it's the quickest.
"It's how much trq you have at 60' and how much HP at the end."
Torq is an acceleration figure while HP is a trap speed figure. A high trapping car doesn't mean it's the quickest.
I shift @ 6500. That puts my rpm @ 4350 on 1 to 2, 4750 on 2 to 3, and 5000 on 3 to 4.
My torque is about 370 @ 4300, peak is 390 @ 4700 and is down to 320 @ 6500.
So that is about 360 average between 4300 and 6500.
Last edited by DaleMX; 10-31-2004 at 08:47 AM.
#19
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2MuchRiceMakesMeSick
You need both to go fast.
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Sure but in drag,
"It's how much trq you have at 60' and how much HP at the end."
"It's how much trq you have at 60' and how much HP at the end."
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Torq is an acceleration figure while HP is a trap speed figure. A high trapping car doesn't mean it's the quickest.
My favorite example for this is when I compare time slips from my stock ws6 agianst my step-dads SC'd mustang GT. My best time, with my #2 piston rings shot, was 13.1 @ 105mph where as his is 13.8 @ 108.