Help Fast!!! Don't think I received the correct Torquer II cam!! tuning help>
Originally Posted by SilverSmoke
Definately wanted the 113 lsa, knew that much. Still confused, but as long as this is the Torquer II cam which is pushing out some nice number on an x-er cut i'm fine.
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Jon@Texas-Speed
The cam is slightly different from our traditional TQ.2 grind. Is it enough to make a difference? I doubt it. I meant our advertised numbers are at .050" and what you were looking at was the .006" tappet lift numbers when you were thinking the cam was a 283/283. If you would like to change the cam, give me a call back and we'll get that cam coming back to us and get you a new TQ.2 cam on the way. Its no problem at all!
Jon
Jon
I guess for everyone elses info, more mine, lol:
So I guess this is a 234/234 on 113lsa I have correct?
How will this affect the hp/tq numbers through the rpm range vs the standard 232/234 TQII? Will it drop the torque down low and raise up high, lower hp down low, and raise it up top more, or opposite, etc??
Thanks again everyone!
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
This is what you have now:
234/234, .598/.598 113+1 lsa
This is what it is supposed to be:
232/234 .595/.598 112+2 lsa ( TSP Torquer Revision 2 )
The 234 will Idle better (no split and 113 lsa), but that means it will have less (chopchop) lope
The power band on the 234 will be 100 (maybe 200, but I don't think so) rpm higher.
As noted above by JRP the lobes on the 234 is 3727 (int/exh) on the Torquer II they are 3726/3727 (int/exh).
Bottom line the cam you got is similar and close to Torquer specs but IT is not a Torquer II and it will act differently.
I still say return it.
234/234, .598/.598 113+1 lsa
This is what it is supposed to be:
232/234 .595/.598 112+2 lsa ( TSP Torquer Revision 2 )
The 234 will Idle better (no split and 113 lsa), but that means it will have less (chopchop) lope
The power band on the 234 will be 100 (maybe 200, but I don't think so) rpm higher.
As noted above by JRP the lobes on the 234 is 3727 (int/exh) on the Torquer II they are 3726/3727 (int/exh).
Bottom line the cam you got is similar and close to Torquer specs but IT is not a Torquer II and it will act differently.
I still say return it.
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
This is what you have now:
234/234, .598/.598 113+1 lsa
This is what it is supposed to be:
232/234 .595/.598 112+2 lsa ( TSP Torquer Revision 2 )
The 234 will Idle better (no split and 113 lsa), but that means it will have less (chopchop) lope
The power band on the 234 will be 100 (maybe 200, but I don't think so) rpm higher.
As noted above by JRP the lobes on the 234 is 3727 (int/exh) on the Torquer II they are 3726/3727 (int/exh).
Bottom line the cam you got is similar and close to Torquer specs but IT is not a Torquer II and it will act differently.
I still say return it.
234/234, .598/.598 113+1 lsa
This is what it is supposed to be:
232/234 .595/.598 112+2 lsa ( TSP Torquer Revision 2 )
The 234 will Idle better (no split and 113 lsa), but that means it will have less (chopchop) lope
The power band on the 234 will be 100 (maybe 200, but I don't think so) rpm higher.
As noted above by JRP the lobes on the 234 is 3727 (int/exh) on the Torquer II they are 3726/3727 (int/exh).
Bottom line the cam you got is similar and close to Torquer specs but IT is not a Torquer II and it will act differently.
I still say return it.
Ok cool, thanks!!!
Definately want the power a bit lower, I don't go racing all the time, and NJ roads demand power in the middle. And if its going to affect the idle, well, I do want something a bit mean sounding
The LSA will change the idle more than the difference in lobes. Driveability wise, sound, ect., with a good tune, you won't be able to tell the difference in these cams. But like I say, if you want to send it back, we'll get you a TQ.2 cam on the way. 
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Jon's getting me squared away.
I just hope btw TSP and Comp they can get the replacement beginning next week for installation for appt. I have. Crossing fingers...
Thanks everyone for all your help!
I just hope btw TSP and Comp they can get the replacement beginning next week for installation for appt. I have. Crossing fingers...
Thanks everyone for all your help!
Originally Posted by -Joseph-
I've never seen one ground to those specs from us (234/234). Best to call your sales guy in the am though. Who's name is that above the grind numbers, possible drop-ship?