Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

224/224 vs. 224/228?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2005, 01:53 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
8banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago - Southside
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 224/224 vs. 224/228?

I've been developing an interest in the 224/228 cams lately and am wondering how they compare to 224/224's. If you look at the FMS F5, which has .588"/.581" lift, compared to the TR224, what would be the difference power wise?
Old 10-10-2005, 04:31 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
DaddySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The split cam will help if you have concerns on the exhaust side. Mine for instance needs help on the exhaust side with the TTS headers and cats so I would lean toward the split.
Old 10-10-2005, 05:11 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
 
XTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All else being equal, the longer overall duration will make more power also.
Old 10-10-2005, 03:47 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

tr224. I'm putting down over 436hp and 414tq with one.
Old 10-10-2005, 03:54 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Every cam GM makes for the LSx engine is split. ASA, HOT CAM, etc. Why?
Old 10-10-2005, 09:44 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
ninobrn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would assume to eliminate back pressue and to add to the midrange power of their cars. i think. oh well, it sounds good.
Old 10-10-2005, 10:43 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

would it be worth it to upgrade from a TR224/.563 to a TR224/228 .581./588 ? will be puttin heads on soon, just wonderin if i should go with a slightly biiger cam for the combo, thanx

have: longtubes,full catback and a Shaner S2 now
Old 10-11-2005, 01:32 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
FastPacedGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if you're gonna do it again, might as well go a bit bigger than that yet.
Old 10-11-2005, 02:09 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
MountainMotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea, I'm running a TR224 with Patriot Stage 2 Heads and it runs real smooth. I'm running right at 400RWHP but if it's tuned right I'd probably go bigger on the cam. It had a TR224 in it when I bought it but I was thinking of going larger myself. If your getting a nice set of heads I'd go even larger than either of those.
Old 10-11-2005, 08:31 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

thanx for the replies, I dont want to much bigger on the cam, that's why i asked if it would be worth the effort to swap........... or maybe a 231/237 .576, what would that cam do ?
Old 10-11-2005, 09:10 AM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (19)
 
Bryan @ Speed Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^ that's more like it! if you were going through the hastle to install a new cam i def wouldn't just move up a tiny bit... but if you don't want a huge cam, then something in the 230's range would be a good choice like the one you spec'd.
Old 10-11-2005, 09:19 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
ninobrn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i honestly do not think its worth it to get a slightly bigger cam. its will wont yeild you much more than your current cam IMHO.
Old 10-11-2005, 09:24 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

i'm just wondering if the cam I have now would be a little on the small side for the PRC 2.5 heads that I'm installing....thanx to everyone for there replies
Old 10-11-2005, 09:27 AM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

this is with a half *** tune in April, I think it would pull a little better numbers now

Old 10-11-2005, 09:46 AM
  #15  
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Race Car Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The only way to answer your question is on the dyno, and the difference between these two cams would be very small.
Originally Posted by 8banger
I've been developing an interest in the 224/228 cams lately and am wondering how they compare to 224/224's. If you look at the FMS F5, which has .588"/.581" lift, compared to the TR224, what would be the difference power wise?
Old 10-11-2005, 09:53 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
ninobrn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oange ss
i'm just wondering if the cam I have now would be a little on the small side for the PRC 2.5 heads that I'm installing....thanx to everyone for there replies
its fine. unless your going to bump up to 23x/23x dont waste the cash or time. you will have a good smog legal car and provided the right tune, over 400hp is easily obtainable.
Nino
Old 10-11-2005, 10:06 AM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ninobrn99
its fine. unless your going to bump up to 23x/23x dont waste the cash or time. you will have a good smog legal car and provided the right tune, over 400hp is easily obtainable.
Nino
hopefully it'll be around 420 ish, I'm gonna re-dyno this week and dyno after the head install to get a good before and after, obviously I'll post the results when I get em



Quick Reply: 224/224 vs. 224/228?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.