Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

427 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2006, 01:31 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
LSXRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: reno
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 427 heads

OK i searched and searched and came up with many differant answers. I am doing A 427 stroker on my ls6 i have LQ9 heads and ls6 heads which head would be better to use if i get them worked over by a shop? if they need to be at all?

or should i get different heads and how much do they cost$$$

thanx
Old 01-27-2006, 01:57 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
NoGamesLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would think that the ls6 heads would flow better, but you'll be at high compression. I'm building an engine right now so this is where Ive been spending alot of my time http://www.diamondracing.net/cocalc.htm
Old 01-27-2006, 02:19 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Either head even if ported will still be restrictive on a big 427, IMO. I am planning on using GM LS7 or Warhawk LS7X heads on my 427.
Old 01-27-2006, 08:03 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought the 6.0 Liter heads had LS6 ports, but bigger chambers. I guess I thought they would have flowed similarly when ported out.
Old 01-27-2006, 09:10 AM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
I thought the 6.0 Liter heads had LS6 ports, but bigger chambers. I guess I thought they would have flowed similarly when ported out.
The 6.0L's can get er done. These are my TEA's set up for 4.125.

lift intake exhaust
.100 70.2 59.3
.200 143.4 128.7
.300 216.8 188.7
.400 270.0 232.1
.500 311.9 257.2
.550 330.0 264.0
.600 343.8 268.0

Wish the chart had gone up to .650, would probably have seen 350cfm
Old 01-27-2006, 11:56 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
I thought the 6.0 Liter heads had LS6 ports, but bigger chambers. I guess I thought they would have flowed similarly when ported out.
That's a correct assumption. After porting, the heads flow almost identical. Most porters, espeacailly CNCers, run the same program wether it's 6.0 or LS6. I would let the compression needed be my determing factor.
Old 01-27-2006, 12:31 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
LSXRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: reno
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so to clear things up if they are going to CNC the final outcome will be the same if the LQ9 are milled. I have the LUNATI rotating assem for a LS6 so pistons are rev. dome.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.