cenTX-LS1

iTrader: (1)

Too close to call. Not a whole lot of hp difference. You will be happy with either.

SLP4CamaroSS

iTrader: (16)

i rather have a car tahts fast on the track rather then having a dyno queen but both os cool lol

SIC LSX

iTrader: (10)

i have the 231/237 for 2 months now but i am waiting to put it in but i would get the 233/239. the reason i got mine is i got pushrods and cam for $250

nokeman

iTrader: (30)

WOW how did you do that??^^^

SIC LSX

iTrader: (10)

friend i could of got the PP stage 2 5.3 heads for $500 too but didnt have the cash so my buddy got them and sold me the PP dual gold valve springs for $100

SIC LSX

iTrader: (10)

bump

TL00CamaroSS

iTrader: (1)

What kind of spring life could you expect with the 233/239 cam?

NexGen

iTrader: (2)

I like that cam, thats the one I want to put in my car. There is a guy that made 435 cam only with that cam and bolt ons, thats my choice

JRracing

iTrader: (35)

The 233/239 gets my vote. If my cam does not work, thats what I'm going to get.

Mike98WS6

iTrader: (5)

I have the 231/237 in my car. I love the power it makes. It pulls like a **** up top.

SouthFL.02.SS

Gears, Heads, HVMC LT's and a 90/90 wake up the 231/237 across the entire rev range (it really is a top end cam otherwise). I was very happy with the available power it produced low/mid/high when it was paired with strong bolt-ons. My finalized setup was very ideal- it pulled strong up top (as it always did), but it also had good low/mid. I'd rather have that cam in there, performing such a task than a cam with more aggresssive lobes.