Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pulled heads on the 408. Engine/head status pics inside.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #21  
orangeapeel's Avatar
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 4
From: Justin, TX
Default

I have been running the TR-55's for about 5k miles now and can't tell a difference between those and the TR-5's.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #22  
gojo's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: w.s.n.c.
Default

Originally Posted by ArcticZ28
Well, I've been talking to Jake Fusion and have been contemplating a different route. Considering the extremely low DCR with my cam (7.4:1), Jake suggested milling the heads .018 and running a cometic .040 gasket to give me a .032 quench. This would bump up my SCR to about 11.8:1 and give me a DCR of 8.2:1 which would help gain back a lot of the lost power with my low DCR.
A couple of thoughts.

I come up with similar numbers as yours except for DCR. I get up around 9.

If the plugs are in cylinder order it looks like #7 is lean. You might want to flow the injectors and put the higher flowing ones where the whiter plugs are.

Are the head chambers matched to the bore?
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #23  
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Nevada, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
A couple of thoughts.

I come up with similar numbers as yours except for DCR. I get up around 9.

If the plugs are in cylinder order it looks like #7 is lean. You might want to flow the injectors and put the higher flowing ones where the whiter plugs are.

Are the head chambers matched to the bore?
He has stock 317 castings. Pushing the bore out an extra .015 on each side makes little to no difference with stock valves. I would be willing to bet that when the guys does his heads, he will push the bore slightly over to match the 2.08 valve.

Brandon
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #24  
gojo's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: w.s.n.c.
Default

Originally Posted by xfactor_pitbulls
He has stock 317 castings. Pushing the bore out an extra .015 on each side makes little to no difference with stock valves. I would be willing to bet that when the guys does his heads, he will push the bore slightly over to match the 2.08 valve.

Brandon

Did you mean bore or chamber?

My point is that opening up the chamber would unshroud the valves and that does make a difference.
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #25  
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Nevada, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
Did you mean bore or chamber?

My point is that opening up the chamber would unshroud the valves and that does make a difference.
The heads have a 4.00" chamber width. I speak in terms of bore, because that is the focus of directed air flow. "Deshrouding" a 2.00" intake valve is pointless on an otherwise stock 317 casting, period. Not to mention the limitations of the stock valve job, and flat *** end of the intake valve. It doesnt make a difference.

Brandon
Reply
Old May 16, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #26  
1QuickT-A's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Default

You definately aren't running all that rich.. Maybe you are at wide open throttle, but judging from the looks of your plugs you aren't running rich at part throttle. Definately looks like oil residue on the pistons to me.

And yes I think you should mill the heads as well..
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #27  
ArcticZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 4
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

Mr. Luos - I'm running the LS6 PCV setup, yet I'm still burning a good bit of oil. I'm thinking about putting a catch can setup in there. We'll see what I feel like....

gojo - I think others have answered your questions about the heads. As for the plugs, they are in order but the whitest ones correspond to cylinders one and two. I don't quite see what you're seeing in the #7 looking leaner.

1Quick - I was actually surprised the plugs came out looking this good, considering the AFR during the dyno runs and it smells rich as hell when it's running. If I'm sitting at a stop light the smell of gas just fills the car. Of course, my headers are leaking a bit at the collector and the y so once that gets welded up it should fix the smell a bit.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #28  
777's Avatar
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

The plugs look alright, but mine aren't near that dark.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #29  
Byter's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Pennsville, NJ
Default

Sorry I didn't post pics, but when I pulled the heads to install Morel lifters and reinsert my 224/228 "AFR" cam, my combustion chambers and pistons were a lot cleaner because I installed and AMW catch can the last time I pulled the heads (about 7K miles ago). Typically they looked like yours before using the catch can, so IMHO the it works. Also, I've been running TR55's forever. Good luck.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 02:59 PM
  #30  
ArcticZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 4
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

I think I will be looking into the catch can setup. Is AMW the best bang for the buck, or what is everyone using? I'm not looking to spend a ton of money on a catch can system.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #31  
777's Avatar
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 2
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Breathers?
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #32  
gojo's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: w.s.n.c.
Default

[QUOTE=ArcticZ28]
gojo - I think others have answered your questions about the heads. As for the plugs, they are in order but the whitest ones correspond to cylinders one and two. I don't quite see what you're seeing in the #7 looking leaner.
QUOTE]

The bottom left hand plug is whiter relative to the others. The LSx engines seem to burn the number 7 piston at times. If that was #7 and you were to run overall lean I was suggesting a precaution. I'll be flowing my injectors soon and will put the richest on 7 just in case.
Regarding the heads, I didn't have a question. I mistakenly assumed you were going with bigger valves. In which case unshrouding is a good thing. If your not it's not worth it.

Last edited by gojo; May 17, 2006 at 03:50 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #33  
ArcticZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 4
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

[QUOTE=gojo]
Originally Posted by ArcticZ28
gojo - I think others have answered your questions about the heads. As for the plugs, they are in order but the whitest ones correspond to cylinders one and two. I don't quite see what you're seeing in the #7 looking leaner.
QUOTE]

The bottom left hand plug is whiter relative to the others. The LSx engines seem to burn the number 7 piston at times. If that was #7 and you were to run overall lean I was suggesting a precaution. I'll be flowing my injectors soon and will put the richest on 7 just in case.
Regarding the heads, I didn't have a question. I mistakingly assumed you were going with bigger valves. In which case unshrouding is a good thing. If your not it's not worth it.
I think you are a bit confused on the plug layout. They are arranged as if you were looking at the front of the car. So they are numbered:
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1

So the bottom left one would be cylinder #2.

As for the heads, I will be going with a 2.08/1.6 valve setup. Hopefully that clears things up
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #34  
gojo's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: w.s.n.c.
Default

[QUOTE=ArcticZ28]
Originally Posted by gojo

I think you are a bit confused on the plug layout. They are arranged as if you were looking at the front of the car. So they are numbered:
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1

So the bottom left one would be cylinder #2.

As for the heads, I will be going with a 2.08/1.6 valve setup. Hopefully that clears things up
I'm not confused. I understood you when you pointed out that #7 was not the bottom left plug. If you sit in the drivers seat #7 would be bottom left in your picture. Read my comments regarding the plugs, my comments were qualified.
Since you are going with 2.08's, I stand by my opinion that unshrouding would be good and I agree that the work will really wake up your car.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #35  
ArcticZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 4
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

Allllrighty, I have obviously read your comments, was just trying to clear up confusion as I am looking at the plugs right now and #7 doesn't look white as compared to others. It is probably something in the pics. I'm not sure where you got the feeling I was trying to make your statements seem unqualified. At any rate, back on to the catch can decision... would breathers work just as well as a catch can? I'm not looking to skimp on the setup but am also not looking to spend bank on it. Just want something that would clear up this problem.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 07:30 PM
  #36  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

If its a street car, i would not do breathers. I recently went back to a PCV setup to extend oil life. You can get catch cans for fairly cheap off of ebay. Or you can use a cambell hausfield air somepressor oil seperator for like 14 bucks from autozone. Im using that and its working pretty well. I do have to drain it fairly often though, so im looking into an ls6 pcv mod to cut down.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #37  
ArcticZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 4
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

Well, I have the LS6 pcv, so would using a catch can instead work out better for me considering the extra money it would cost, or would it not be worth it.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 08:05 PM
  #38  
TJ's Avatar
TJ
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: pensacola fl
Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
If its a street car, i would not do breathers. I recently went back to a PCV setup to extend oil life. You can get catch cans for fairly cheap off of ebay. Or you can use a cambell hausfield air somepressor oil seperator for like 14 bucks from autozone. Im using that and its working pretty well. I do have to drain it fairly often though, so im looking into an ls6 pcv mod to cut down.
at 3k intervals, i dont see how using a pcv can extend oil life. i prefer to use fresh oil, im not out to get the max milage out of oil. id rather spend money on fresh oil sooner than expected than an engine rebuild, but im just paranoid.
i vote for a breather, its cheap and easy.
Reply
Old May 17, 2006 | 09:09 PM
  #39  
xfactor_pitbulls's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Nevada, TX
Default

Originally Posted by TJ
at 3k intervals, i dont see how using a pcv can extend oil life. i prefer to use fresh oil, im not out to get the max milage out of oil. id rather spend money on fresh oil sooner than expected than an engine rebuild, but im just paranoid.
i vote for a breather, its cheap and easy.
I am about to swap to breathers as well. My home made can fills more quickly than I like. At 3K mile intervals, I get about 4 oz. of goo.

Brandon
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #40  
GrannySShifting's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 21
From: Glen Burnie, Md
Default

put a catch can on it, .040 gaskets and mill to 11.2-11.5:1 Jon would be the best easy way to do it. Those pistons dont come out of the hole much do they.

Hey cheapskate, buy a new set of 15 dollar plugs and put them in there, the TR6s are the way to go tis why I put them in there. Ive run them on bolton cars with no power loss, so I wouldnt be scared.

You are going to smell some kind of fumes with a 240 duration cam, irrelevant of the air fuel. Obviously its not that rich or the plugs would be sooted up more. Looks more like oil consumption thananything with the greying of the porcelien.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.