Mac lowend versus longtube lowend
Mac lowend versus longtube lowend Would a guy lose more lowend torque from Mac headers or from longtubes such as flp's or grot's?
It seems like lots of people are saying that they loose lowend from adding headers of any kind. So, with which ones do you lose more lowend torque?
It seems like lots of people are saying that they loose lowend from adding headers of any kind. So, with which ones do you lose more lowend torque?
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Re: Mac lowend versus longtube lowend [quote]Originally posted by Blackbird:
<strong>do you lose low end compared to stock manifolds?
or just they make less low end then full lengths?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I didn't loose any hp/tq anywhere when I added MAC headers w/ off-road. Here is the dyno graph:
(copy and paste link into address bar to view)
http://www.geocities.com/jason99ta1/header_dyno.jpg
Later on I switched to Grotyohann longtubes w/ an off-road y-pipe. The only difference in the two runs are the headers/y-pipe.
http://www.thunderracing.com/jasonmacvsghann.jpg
This is was with a Lunati/B1 cam and stock heads. On a stock internal motor, there is hardly any difference between the longtubes and the MACs.
Jason
<strong>do you lose low end compared to stock manifolds?
or just they make less low end then full lengths?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I didn't loose any hp/tq anywhere when I added MAC headers w/ off-road. Here is the dyno graph:
(copy and paste link into address bar to view)
http://www.geocities.com/jason99ta1/header_dyno.jpg
Later on I switched to Grotyohann longtubes w/ an off-road y-pipe. The only difference in the two runs are the headers/y-pipe.
http://www.thunderracing.com/jasonmacvsghann.jpg
This is was with a Lunati/B1 cam and stock heads. On a stock internal motor, there is hardly any difference between the longtubes and the MACs.
Jason
