Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Overlap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2006, 08:21 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
YankeeVert.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Overlap

For idle lope what overlap is the most important the one at .050 lift or the one at .006 lift ? With a 224/224 , 114 LSA cam there is a 4* difference in overlap at .006 lift between the XE and XE-R lobes. Will this make a noticable difference in idle lope?
Old 11-28-2006, 10:29 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

the higher the number, the more overlap. the overlap @ 50 will be the same as 60, just numerically lower because of the input value being lower.

how aggressive the lobe is has very little to no bearing on the idle.
Old 11-28-2006, 10:42 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The XE-R will idle a little better than XE for a given duration at .05. It is rounding error with a decent tune on a cam like that.
Old 11-28-2006, 04:23 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
YankeeVert.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Troy,MI.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
The XE-R will idle a little better than XE for a given duration at .05. It is rounding error with a decent tune on a cam like that.
What do you mean by rounding error? When I plug the values into the spredsheet for cam calculations I get 49* overlap for the XE lobe and 45* for the XE-R lobe. Are you saying that the calculations on the spreadsheet are off by that much? Not trying to be a smartass, just trying to learn/understand.

Thanks




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.