Accurate o2 readings?
Is the readings close enough and sensitive enough to judge affects of part changes based on wot a/f? How different would wide band readings be compared to stock o2's? I figure some dyno operators on here might have tested this.
Last time I used a TechII, at WOT my O2's were like 970... Way too rich.
I'll use one of the above and tune at the street/track for about 900 02's, and then dyno it when I can and look for a 13:1 AF.
Oh, and when I dynoed the ARE 422ci, I dynoed 433rwhp with a 13.5:1 AF and my 02's on the way down there hit like 770, so I was waaay too lean. I had to install a new intank pump for the big motor. Now I have too much fuel pressure, it's like 61lbs at idle.
[ January 16, 2002: Message edited by: Pro Stock John ]</p>
Examples...
.700mv and you KNOW you're way too lean.
.980mv and you KNOW you're way too rich.
.870-.910mv and you have a good idea that you're at least in the ballpark. <img src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" border="0"> You can pretty safely assume that major power gains are not to be had from a better mixture. Some? Maybe. Alot? Not likely.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time



